09-23-2010, 10:51 AM
I\'m going with SU +1 or more because I\'ll be right if we win by any amount.
Yeah, the close loss thing does tell me that this isn\'t a patsy. Â And let\'s face it, Stanford\'s last three opponents have been kind of patsy-ish, with the exception of UCLA, which I could read either way--I mean, what if I knew UCLA would upset Texas (which it won\'t, I think)--would I go for +21 or more?
I\'m cautious, but optimistic. Â The pass rush needs to plant a Dayne Crist tree in the middle of that stadium, watered with the tears of deluded Notre Dame faithful. Â I\'m primarily keyed on our defense performing--I think the offense, despite possibly missing the #1 receiver, will be okay. Â RBBC will be good to present change-of-pace match-ups. Â Does Stanford have a hurry-up package? Â Let\'s do that, all day.
Screw that, let\'s play the WISHBONE. Â We have a very special OL, a running QB, a stud fullback and many decent tailbacks. Â ND will never see it coming.
Yeah, the close loss thing does tell me that this isn\'t a patsy. Â And let\'s face it, Stanford\'s last three opponents have been kind of patsy-ish, with the exception of UCLA, which I could read either way--I mean, what if I knew UCLA would upset Texas (which it won\'t, I think)--would I go for +21 or more?
I\'m cautious, but optimistic. Â The pass rush needs to plant a Dayne Crist tree in the middle of that stadium, watered with the tears of deluded Notre Dame faithful. Â I\'m primarily keyed on our defense performing--I think the offense, despite possibly missing the #1 receiver, will be okay. Â RBBC will be good to present change-of-pace match-ups. Â Does Stanford have a hurry-up package? Â Let\'s do that, all day.
Screw that, let\'s play the WISHBONE. Â We have a very special OL, a running QB, a stud fullback and many decent tailbacks. Â ND will never see it coming.
