[msqueri]

Interesting you say over the last 4 years. You expressed big concerns before the W/L supported your position. In retrospect, the W/L was a lagging indicator and it might make sense to include facts further back in time.

I’d rather be persuasive than right in this case. For those uninitiated to the PhD level analysis of Stanford football we seem like lunatics complaining about 9 win seasons. That’s also why I didn’t make the argument that signs of incompetence were there from the start. That won’t resonate with anybody but the most obsessive, who are not who need to get off the dime here.

[msqueri]

Interesting you say over the last 4 years. You expressed big concerns before the W/L supported your position. In retrospect, the W/L was a lagging indicator and it might make sense to include facts further back in time.

I’d rather be persuasive than right in this case. For those uninitiated to the PhD level analysis of Stanford football we seem like lunatics complaining about 9 win seasons. That’s also why I didn’t make the argument that signs of incompetence were there from the start. That won’t resonate with anybody but the most obsessive, who are not who need to get off the dime here.