[Farm93]

A QB change is merely a temporary workaround if the root cause is the inability of Stanford's coaching staff to coach up/prepare/teach whoever is currently the QB.  I'm trying to remember not to throw Nunes under the bus =\

You mean that coaching staff that is 17-4?  The coaching staff that has crafted the best defense the conference has had in many years?  That coaching staff?

Football is still a team game.  Look no further than SC.  Lee dazzled as he set all kinds of receiving records last week, but the team lost.  Expensive HCs, great QBs, and amazing WR play does not always translate into wins.

Give me a no frills QB and a 17-4 team record with 2 wins over SC and 2 Big Game wins.  If that level of winning is the by-product of some inability to coach/prepare or teach in some aspect of the game then that's OK by me.  Besides if Shaw and the staff could do it all, Shaw would be making $4+ million per year in the NFL.

[Farm93]

A QB change is merely a temporary workaround if the root cause is the inability of Stanford's coaching staff to coach up/prepare/teach whoever is currently the QB.  I'm trying to remember not to throw Nunes under the bus =\

You mean that coaching staff that is 17-4?  The coaching staff that has crafted the best defense the conference has had in many years?  That coaching staff?

Football is still a team game.  Look no further than SC.  Lee dazzled as he set all kinds of receiving records last week, but the team lost.  Expensive HCs, great QBs, and amazing WR play does not always translate into wins.

Give me a no frills QB and a 17-4 team record with 2 wins over SC and 2 Big Game wins.  If that level of winning is the by-product of some inability to coach/prepare or teach in some aspect of the game then that's OK by me.  Besides if Shaw and the staff could do it all, Shaw would be making $4+ million per year in the NFL.