Quote:Disagree. I thought it was egregiously wrong that Love played against Arizona State after missing the previous week. But there are always different ways of looking at things. Here's an ESPN write-up favorable to Shaw (whereas I remember being pretty critical of the decision to have Love suit up and play after seeing his first half performance):
Quote:
Stanford running back Bryce Love returned after missing the Utah game with a left ankle injury. He was not fully healthy against the Sun Devils, but did show bursts of explosiveness before Shaw opted to take him out in the second half.
Love's stats: 21 yards on 11 carries
https://www.espn.com/college-football/re.../401012768
Anyway, most of us know that Love sustained a severe knee injury on what was close to the last play of Big Game. It is possible that without that injury--the sort of unfortunate thing that is a danger for every running back--he might have been healthy enough for the NFL.
As you acknowledge, any player on any play could suffer an ACL injury. Him playing through injuries earlier in the season didn't cause his ACL injury.
So is the malpractice that Shaw didn't sit his best player in the Big Game because it was a "meaningless" game and he could be a high draft pick and he could maybe be injured in it? What's even the point of CFB then?
