[Spiny_Norman]

Here's a straight matchup--1 vs. 1, 2 vs. 2 etc--of Stanford vs. Auburn.
The parenthetical numbers are each player's current world ranking.  The plus/minus numbers indicate each players final score in stroke play:

Sampedro (22), -6 vs. Davis (10), +4

Ganne (58), E  vs. Schofill (14), +5

Xu (56), +8 vs. Foster (130), +12

Heck (45), +6 vs. Weidenfeld (57), +13

Engleman (51), +10 vs. Cranston (216), +15

And here are the actual pairings. Match 1 off at 7:40 am.

Englemann (51), +10 vs. Davis (10), +4

Heck (45), +6 vs. Foster (130), +12

Xu (56), +8 vs. Cranston (216), +15

Ganne (58), E vs. Weidenfeld (57), +13

Sampedro (22), -6 vs. Schofill (14), +5

But let's remember that Stanford lost to USC last year when Brianna Navarossa (ranked 161st in the world) beat Rose Zhang (ranked #1). As they say in the financial world, past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.

Tracker here - https://results.golfstat.com/public/lead...9193&rid=1

[Spiny_Norman]

Here's a straight matchup--1 vs. 1, 2 vs. 2 etc--of Stanford vs. Auburn.
The parenthetical numbers are each player's current world ranking.  The plus/minus numbers indicate each players final score in stroke play:

Sampedro (22), -6 vs. Davis (10), +4

Ganne (58), E  vs. Schofill (14), +5

Xu (56), +8 vs. Foster (130), +12

Heck (45), +6 vs. Weidenfeld (57), +13

Engleman (51), +10 vs. Cranston (216), +15

And here are the actual pairings. Match 1 off at 7:40 am.

Englemann (51), +10 vs. Davis (10), +4

Heck (45), +6 vs. Foster (130), +12

Xu (56), +8 vs. Cranston (216), +15

Ganne (58), E vs. Weidenfeld (57), +13

Sampedro (22), -6 vs. Schofill (14), +5

But let's remember that Stanford lost to USC last year when Brianna Navarossa (ranked 161st in the world) beat Rose Zhang (ranked #1). As they say in the financial world, past performance is not a guarantee of future returns.

Tracker here - https://results.golfstat.com/public/lead...9193&rid=1