[82lsju]

My understanding is there need be a like percentage of participation and financial aid based not on the number of athletes, but on the student body in general. That, I believe is the general “participation” test.  I believe schools can try to prove circumstances to make exceptions.

In any event, I see almost no way that this settlement, if approved, is not heavily litigated on title IX issues.  Why should a AllAmerican QB  candidate be paid more than a member of the women’s volleyball team? Or, for that matter, the men’s volleyball team.

Not to mention a host of other wage discrimination claims.  Based on any number of protected statuses.

Stanford undergrad population is 52% women and 48% men 

https://facts.stanford.edu/academics/und...e-profile/

[82lsju]

My understanding is there need be a like percentage of participation and financial aid based not on the number of athletes, but on the student body in general. That, I believe is the general “participation” test.  I believe schools can try to prove circumstances to make exceptions.

In any event, I see almost no way that this settlement, if approved, is not heavily litigated on title IX issues.  Why should a AllAmerican QB  candidate be paid more than a member of the women’s volleyball team? Or, for that matter, the men’s volleyball team.

Not to mention a host of other wage discrimination claims.  Based on any number of protected statuses.

Stanford undergrad population is 52% women and 48% men 

https://facts.stanford.edu/academics/und...e-profile/