[Hulk01]

Stanford’s women were 22-under for their five matches, a stroke better than Texas. 
If played as stroke play, you get this leaderboard:

Laurie Kim, Texas -17
Leigh Chien, Stanford -7
Paula Martin, Stanford -6
Meja Ortengren, Stanford -5
Kelly Xu, Stanford -4

Player’s world ranking in parenthesis, followed by current season’s average score per 18 holes. 
(Scores from the Cal men’s and womens’ combined match play event are not included because I cannot find them—save for Megga Ganne’s fabulous  8-under for 15 holes.)

Megha Ganne (24)  69.7  (low -8 for 15 holes)(two rounds, 31 holes)
Paula Martin (11) 70.0  (low -5)
Meja Ortengren (22) 70.8  (low -4)
Kelly Xu (40)  71.6  (low -5)
Leigh Chien (136)  71.6  (low -3, twice)
Nora Sundberg (44)  72.0 (low -1)
Andrea Revuelta (10)  72.0 (low -4)(-4 for her last four rounds)

Perhaps interesting to compare: only eleven Stanford women have ever  averaged under 72.0 for a full season.

[Hulk01]

Stanford’s women were 22-under for their five matches, a stroke better than Texas. 
If played as stroke play, you get this leaderboard:

Laurie Kim, Texas -17
Leigh Chien, Stanford -7
Paula Martin, Stanford -6
Meja Ortengren, Stanford -5
Kelly Xu, Stanford -4

Player’s world ranking in parenthesis, followed by current season’s average score per 18 holes. 
(Scores from the Cal men’s and womens’ combined match play event are not included because I cannot find them—save for Megga Ganne’s fabulous  8-under for 15 holes.)

Megha Ganne (24)  69.7  (low -8 for 15 holes)(two rounds, 31 holes)
Paula Martin (11) 70.0  (low -5)
Meja Ortengren (22) 70.8  (low -4)
Kelly Xu (40)  71.6  (low -5)
Leigh Chien (136)  71.6  (low -3, twice)
Nora Sundberg (44)  72.0 (low -1)
Andrea Revuelta (10)  72.0 (low -4)(-4 for her last four rounds)

Perhaps interesting to compare: only eleven Stanford women have ever  averaged under 72.0 for a full season.