[2006alum]

Stanford may be facing headwinds from a number of sources. Here’s a big booster of the university who’s no longer so hot on Stanford:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolog...diversity/

Perhaps. But Andreeson has kind of gone off the reservation at this point, so I'm not sure I'd use him as the modal example of alumni donor thinking. Moreover, the article expressly said thar "Andreeson in his messages did not suggest any action [be] taken against Stanford or MIT."

His wife is Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen and he said “she was forced out” and it would cost Stanford $5 Billion in future donations.

I guess reasonable minds could disagree about the ends to which a university should cater to its rich alumni. I feel like that's why everyone around here boo hisses on U$C, but to me, Laura Arrillaga was about as U$C as it gets in terms of qualifications for running an academic center.

[2006alum]

Stanford may be facing headwinds from a number of sources. Here’s a big booster of the university who’s no longer so hot on Stanford:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technolog...diversity/

Perhaps. But Andreeson has kind of gone off the reservation at this point, so I'm not sure I'd use him as the modal example of alumni donor thinking. Moreover, the article expressly said thar "Andreeson in his messages did not suggest any action [be] taken against Stanford or MIT."

His wife is Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen and he said “she was forced out” and it would cost Stanford $5 Billion in future donations.

I guess reasonable minds could disagree about the ends to which a university should cater to its rich alumni. I feel like that's why everyone around here boo hisses on U$C, but to me, Laura Arrillaga was about as U$C as it gets in terms of qualifications for running an academic center.