the quality of this class

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

the quality of this class

~~OutsiderFan~~
Banned

Posts: 10,234
Threads: 821
Joined: Sep 2011

#3

01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

My money is on Mike Tyler being the star diamond in the rough from this class.Â Eric Cotton and Taijuan Thomas also provide reason to think they will be good.Â Don't want to lose objectivity just because they are Stanford recruits, but the videos on these three guys are impressive.Â

#3

~~OutsiderFan~~

01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

My money is on Mike Tyler being the star diamond in the rough from this class.Â Eric Cotton and Taijuan Thomas also provide reason to think they will be good.Â Don't want to lose objectivity just because they are Stanford recruits, but the videos on these three guys are impressive.Â

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 09:11 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 10:08 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 02:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Cardinal96 - 01-15-2013, 02:13 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 06:02 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-15-2013, 07:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-15-2013, 08:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-15-2013, 08:25 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-15-2013, 10:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 11:28 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-16-2013, 01:10 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-16-2013, 07:27 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-16-2013, 05:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 10:15 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 11:04 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-17-2013, 05:08 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 05:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 07:42 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 08:16 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 08:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:01 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 10:27 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 12:43 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 01-18-2013, 08:07 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-18-2013, 10:19 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 11:32 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-19-2013, 12:54 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-22-2013, 12:20 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stupac2 - 02-01-2013, 10:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 02-01-2013, 12:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 02-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 02-02-2013, 12:24 PM

Chandler Dorrell - by ChicagoCard - 01-26-2013, 03:00 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 05:38 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-26-2013, 05:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-26-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 09:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 01:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-27-2013, 10:58 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 12:15 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-27-2013, 01:14 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:31 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-27-2013, 07:03 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 10:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stan01 - 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-28-2013, 04:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-29-2013, 07:51 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-29-2013, 10:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-31-2013, 05:04 PM

View a Printable Version