[yvonne]

Number of Arizona players who are in the top 100 at their position: 9; number who are not: 17 (34.62% of players are top 100 in their position)
Arizona State: 9; 12 (42.86%)
Cal: 11; 10 (52.38%)
Colorado: 3; 10 (23.08%)
Oregon: 10; 3 (76.92%)
Oregon State: 4; 17 (19.05%)
Stanford: 11; 1 (91.67%)
UCLA: 17; 2 (89.47%)
USC: 14; 0 (100%)
Utah: 6; 20 (23.08%)
Washington: 17; 5 (77.27%)
Washington State: 4; 19 (5.75%)

Granted, large numbers of players provide depth, but if the depth is already provided by the older players, then quality is necessary, and we seem to have hit it. Only three schools have more top 100 players than we do, and only one school has a higher percentage.

[yvonne]

Number of Arizona players who are in the top 100 at their position: 9; number who are not: 17 (34.62% of players are top 100 in their position)
Arizona State: 9; 12 (42.86%)
Cal: 11; 10 (52.38%)
Colorado: 3; 10 (23.08%)
Oregon: 10; 3 (76.92%)
Oregon State: 4; 17 (19.05%)
Stanford: 11; 1 (91.67%)
UCLA: 17; 2 (89.47%)
USC: 14; 0 (100%)
Utah: 6; 20 (23.08%)
Washington: 17; 5 (77.27%)
Washington State: 4; 19 (5.75%)

Granted, large numbers of players provide depth, but if the depth is already provided by the older players, then quality is necessary, and we seem to have hit it. Only three schools have more top 100 players than we do, and only one school has a higher percentage.