the quality of this class

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

the quality of this class

yvonne
Tech Mogul

Posts: 7,464
Threads: 912
Joined: Jan 2018

#19

01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

ESPN has a recruiting roundup, and I think it further supports the argument that this is a strong class, at least compared to the rest of the conference:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...-roundup-7

We have 12 commitments. Of those commitments, five of them are ESPN top 300. Only two schools have an equal or larger number of ESPN 300 commits. Only USC has a higher percentage of ESPN 300 commits. This may not be a class on par with last year's, but it's nothing to be sneezed at.

#19

yvonne

01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

ESPN has a recruiting roundup, and I think it further supports the argument that this is a strong class, at least compared to the rest of the conference:
http://espn.go.com/blog/pac12/post/_/id/...-roundup-7

We have 12 commitments. Of those commitments, five of them are ESPN top 300. Only two schools have an equal or larger number of ESPN 300 commits. Only USC has a higher percentage of ESPN 300 commits. This may not be a class on par with last year's, but it's nothing to be sneezed at.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 09:11 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 10:08 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 02:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Cardinal96 - 01-15-2013, 02:13 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 06:02 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-15-2013, 07:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-15-2013, 08:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-15-2013, 08:25 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-15-2013, 10:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 11:28 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-16-2013, 01:10 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-16-2013, 07:27 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-16-2013, 05:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 10:15 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 11:04 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-17-2013, 05:08 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 05:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 07:42 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 08:16 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 08:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:01 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 10:27 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 12:43 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 01-18-2013, 08:07 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-18-2013, 10:19 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 11:32 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-19-2013, 12:54 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-22-2013, 12:20 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stupac2 - 02-01-2013, 10:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 02-01-2013, 12:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 02-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 02-02-2013, 12:24 PM

Chandler Dorrell - by ChicagoCard - 01-26-2013, 03:00 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 05:38 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-26-2013, 05:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-26-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 09:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 01:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-27-2013, 10:58 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 12:15 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-27-2013, 01:14 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:31 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-27-2013, 07:03 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 10:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stan01 - 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-28-2013, 04:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-29-2013, 07:51 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-29-2013, 10:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-31-2013, 05:04 PM

View a Printable Version