the quality of this class

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

the quality of this class

yvonne
Tech Mogul

Posts: 7,464
Threads: 912
Joined: Jan 2018

#29

01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

How 'bout this class of mostly two-stars. http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruiti...tanford-63

They really sucked. Eight three stars, seven two stars and only two guys with four stars. We couldn't possibly have been thinking about the Rose Bowl with those guys. The only people worth note were the quarterback and wide receiver. Only three linemen were selected, one of them with two stars.

#29

yvonne

01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

How 'bout this class of mostly two-stars. http://rivals.yahoo.com/footballrecruiti...tanford-63

They really sucked. Eight three stars, seven two stars and only two guys with four stars. We couldn't possibly have been thinking about the Rose Bowl with those guys. The only people worth note were the quarterback and wide receiver. Only three linemen were selected, one of them with two stars.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 09:11 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 10:08 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 02:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Cardinal96 - 01-15-2013, 02:13 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 06:02 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-15-2013, 07:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-15-2013, 08:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-15-2013, 08:25 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-15-2013, 10:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 11:28 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-16-2013, 01:10 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-16-2013, 07:27 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-16-2013, 05:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 10:15 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 11:04 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-17-2013, 05:08 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 05:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 07:42 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 08:16 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 08:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:01 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 10:27 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 12:43 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 01-18-2013, 08:07 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-18-2013, 10:19 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 11:32 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-19-2013, 12:54 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-22-2013, 12:20 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stupac2 - 02-01-2013, 10:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 02-01-2013, 12:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 02-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 02-02-2013, 12:24 PM

Chandler Dorrell - by ChicagoCard - 01-26-2013, 03:00 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 05:38 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-26-2013, 05:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-26-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 09:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 01:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-27-2013, 10:58 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 12:15 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-27-2013, 01:14 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:31 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-27-2013, 07:03 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 10:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stan01 - 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-28-2013, 04:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-29-2013, 07:51 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-29-2013, 10:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-31-2013, 05:04 PM

View a Printable Version