the quality of this class

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

the quality of this class

DC
Dolly

Posts: 677
Threads: 10
Joined: Oct 2011

#35

01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Eric Cotton was a 2-star initially, and became a 3-star after he chose Stanford and Stanford chose him.Â

I'm not saying this is the case with all the recruits.Â

#35

DC

01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Eric Cotton was a 2-star initially, and became a 3-star after he chose Stanford and Stanford chose him.Â

I'm not saying this is the case with all the recruits.Â

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 09:11 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 10:08 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 02:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Cardinal96 - 01-15-2013, 02:13 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 06:02 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-15-2013, 07:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-15-2013, 08:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-15-2013, 08:25 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-15-2013, 10:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 11:28 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-16-2013, 01:10 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-16-2013, 07:27 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-16-2013, 05:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 10:15 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 11:04 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-17-2013, 05:08 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 05:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 07:42 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 08:16 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 08:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:01 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 10:27 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 12:43 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 01-18-2013, 08:07 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-18-2013, 10:19 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 11:32 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-19-2013, 12:54 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-22-2013, 12:20 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stupac2 - 02-01-2013, 10:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 02-01-2013, 12:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 02-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 02-02-2013, 12:24 PM

Chandler Dorrell - by ChicagoCard - 01-26-2013, 03:00 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 05:38 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-26-2013, 05:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-26-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 09:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 01:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-27-2013, 10:58 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 12:15 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-27-2013, 01:14 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:31 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-27-2013, 07:03 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 10:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stan01 - 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-28-2013, 04:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-29-2013, 07:51 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-29-2013, 10:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-31-2013, 05:04 PM

View a Printable Version