06-08-2013, 06:14 PM
Looking at last year's NACDA scoring, it appears as if teams in the regionals were scored as tying by the place they finished if they didn't make the final 30 - so the teams that finished in or tied 6th were counted as tying for 31st, then the next were tied for (31st + how ever many teams were tied for those 6th spots; in this case, 39th).
In other words, all 7 teams in the six regionals that finished tied for 6th place were counted as finishing tied for 31st, and their NACDA points were calculated as the sum of places 31-37 in the NACDA 64 team unbracketed scoring divided by 7.
This year, 7 teams finished in or tied for 6th place, and 7 finished tied or in 7th place. So Stanford should score the sum of points of places 38 through 44, divided by 7, or 33 points.
Will be interesting to see if that what's actually happens.
VG
In other words, all 7 teams in the six regionals that finished tied for 6th place were counted as finishing tied for 31st, and their NACDA points were calculated as the sum of places 31-37 in the NACDA 64 team unbracketed scoring divided by 7.
This year, 7 teams finished in or tied for 6th place, and 7 finished tied or in 7th place. So Stanford should score the sum of points of places 38 through 44, divided by 7, or 33 points.
Will be interesting to see if that what's actually happens.
VG