01-24-2014, 10:42 AM
(01-24-2014, 08:40 AM)Spiny_Norman link Wrote:[quote author=burger link=topic=9454.msg82510#msg82510 date=1390571924]maybe Stanford just has a Pauley problem, period.
[quote author=Papa John link=topic=9454.msg82507#msg82507 date=1390548671]I think it's safe to say that Johnny Dawkins has a Pauley Pavilion problem.
[/quote]
Stanford has had a Pauley problem from the time that it opened. Stanford lost every game in Pauley for 25 years (1965 to 1989) before finally winning there in 1990. Stanford had an amazing 8 year winning streak from 1998 to 2005 but has lost every game at UCLA since.
[/quote]
I started following Stanford sports in 1980, my freshman year. During my undergraduate years, the men's basketball team never had a winning conference record, but managed an overall winning record in 1984. That year, we actually beat UCLA at Maples, and I remember the student section chanting "NIT, NIT!" Not as a taunt of the Bruins, but because we desperately wanted a bid to the NIT (the NCAA had yet to fully expand and was way out of reach. And yes, I rushed the very springy court when the game was over.
That trip down memory lane aside, I propose that, for argument's sake, we consider 1986-87 as the beginning of the modern era of Stanford basketball. There's no point comparing Johnny Dawkins coaching to that of Dick Dibiaso or Tom Davis. And while I'm not a big defender of Trent Johnson, his Stanford team did beat UCLA at Pauley Pavilion in 2005, once in four tries. JD is 0-6.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
