11-10-2010, 03:05 PM
If I remember correctly, one of the big differences between California and Texas (which is actually looking at a budget shortfall in the near future) is the means by which each state collects revenue.
California seems to take a large portion of its revenue from income-derived taxes (state income tax), while Texas counters this with zero state income tax and fairly substantial property taxes. Â (I think this is still the case.)
Naturally, as economic cycles ebb and rise, California\'s revenue base will correlate pretty closely, subjecting it to some amount of risk. Â Property taxes in Texas, however, tend to be a very stable source of revenue. The merits of either may be debated, though Texas seems to be doing slightly better at the moment.
California seems to take a large portion of its revenue from income-derived taxes (state income tax), while Texas counters this with zero state income tax and fairly substantial property taxes. Â (I think this is still the case.)
Naturally, as economic cycles ebb and rise, California\'s revenue base will correlate pretty closely, subjecting it to some amount of risk. Â Property taxes in Texas, however, tend to be a very stable source of revenue. The merits of either may be debated, though Texas seems to be doing slightly better at the moment.
