11-16-2010, 09:23 PM
Normally, the drop off is half. Â The other half gets shared by all of the AQ conferences.
However, the real benefit is not the 2nd BCS vs. Alamo, it would be the 2nd BCS vs. Sun or Vegas. Â A Pac-10 team will be going to the Alamo bowl. Â The real difference would be that instead of having some team in the Vegas bowl with virtually no money getting shared after expenses, a team would grab that at-large BCS share.
Normally, the Pac-10 lets the teams spend that first million or a million and a half. Â So put all of the pieces together and it would be about a million a school.
For C.a.l it is a bit more meaningful. Â If Stanford bumps up to the BCS, then C.a.l will be in the Holiday bowl if they finish 6-6. Â For C.a.l getting to the Holiday bowl instead of the Sun Bowl would be a good deal.
Though maybe Te.d.ford followers are tired of the Holiday bowl.
However, the real benefit is not the 2nd BCS vs. Alamo, it would be the 2nd BCS vs. Sun or Vegas. Â A Pac-10 team will be going to the Alamo bowl. Â The real difference would be that instead of having some team in the Vegas bowl with virtually no money getting shared after expenses, a team would grab that at-large BCS share.
Normally, the Pac-10 lets the teams spend that first million or a million and a half. Â So put all of the pieces together and it would be about a million a school.
For C.a.l it is a bit more meaningful. Â If Stanford bumps up to the BCS, then C.a.l will be in the Holiday bowl if they finish 6-6. Â For C.a.l getting to the Holiday bowl instead of the Sun Bowl would be a good deal.
Though maybe Te.d.ford followers are tired of the Holiday bowl.