10-21-2013, 11:25 AM
The reason that the Rose Bowl took TCU instead of Stanford was because of a contractual agreement that each BCS bowl had to take a non-automatic qualifying team every so many years. That won't happen this year.
Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by stupac2 - 10-20-2013, 05:57 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-20-2013, 06:35 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by stupac2 - 10-20-2013, 07:17 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by OutsiderFan - 10-20-2013, 07:37 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by dabigv13 - 10-20-2013, 09:24 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by PrinceLightfoot - 10-20-2013, 09:57 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by dabigv13 - 10-21-2013, 05:43 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by FarmBoy - 10-21-2013, 06:57 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by stupac2 - 10-21-2013, 07:22 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by washingtonismoney - 10-21-2013, 07:51 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by george - 10-21-2013, 08:20 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-21-2013, 08:20 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 2 for 2028 - 10-21-2013, 08:34 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by stupac2 - 10-21-2013, 09:12 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by CowboyIndian - 10-21-2013, 09:34 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by jayasena - 10-21-2013, 10:03 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Renaissance Man - 10-21-2013, 10:06 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Farm93 - 10-21-2013, 10:15 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Kathy - 10-21-2013, 11:04 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by OutsiderFan - 10-21-2013, 11:11 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Extra Point - 10-21-2013, 11:25 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by yvonne - 10-21-2013, 12:12 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by TreeFitty - 10-21-2013, 12:41 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-21-2013, 12:58 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by FarmBoy - 10-21-2013, 01:05 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-21-2013, 01:16 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by CrazedZooChimp - 10-21-2013, 01:55 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by pefloresjr - 10-21-2013, 03:03 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by TreeWeird - 10-21-2013, 03:03 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 76lsjumb - 10-21-2013, 03:42 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 97fan - 10-21-2013, 04:31 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-21-2013, 04:42 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by yvonne - 10-21-2013, 04:45 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 97fan - 10-21-2013, 04:50 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-21-2013, 04:53 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 76lsjumb - 10-21-2013, 05:55 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Bruce Wang - 10-22-2013, 06:10 AM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by Leftcoast - 10-22-2013, 12:06 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by pefloresjr - 10-22-2013, 02:18 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by rudruff - 10-23-2013, 04:51 PM
Re: Stanford #6 in the first BCS rankings - by 76lsjumb - 10-23-2013, 10:00 PM