[OutsiderFan]

Canard,

Why the need to refute points that were never made?  I'm not here to make you color inside the lines.  It's entirely your prerogative to rebut points you are making and tearing down yourself, as if you are somehow winning an argument against me. 

I never said Stanford hasn't made some compromises to win football games.  What I did say is Stanford will not make the kind of compromises Oregon will.  Do you have any evidence that suggests this point is incorrect?  If so, many people here will be eager to challenge your evidence.  If not, what is the point of arguing against yourself?

[OutsiderFan]

Canard,

Why the need to refute points that were never made?  I'm not here to make you color inside the lines.  It's entirely your prerogative to rebut points you are making and tearing down yourself, as if you are somehow winning an argument against me. 

I never said Stanford hasn't made some compromises to win football games.  What I did say is Stanford will not make the kind of compromises Oregon will.  Do you have any evidence that suggests this point is incorrect?  If so, many people here will be eager to challenge your evidence.  If not, what is the point of arguing against yourself?