the quality of this class

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

the quality of this class

stan01
Dolly

Posts: 409
Threads: 41
Joined: Mar 2012

#52

01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

(01-27-2013, 10:22 PM)young_money link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=7402.msg58004#msg58004 date=1359338625]
I am not aware of any thick envelopes in these last 4 (Allen, Cunningham, Smythe, Woods)

Cunningham and Woods didn't get admitted, Allen went with Oregon before hearing back from admissions, and Smythe didn't here back yet either but he grew up a ND fan so not that unexpected. Still not the end of the world IMO.
[/quote]

How did you guys get this information?

#52

stan01

01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

(01-27-2013, 10:22 PM)young_money link Wrote:[quote author=slide link=topic=7402.msg58004#msg58004 date=1359338625]
I am not aware of any thick envelopes in these last 4 (Allen, Cunningham, Smythe, Woods)

Cunningham and Woods didn't get admitted, Allen went with Oregon before hearing back from admissions, and Smythe didn't here back yet either but he grew up a ND fan so not that unexpected. Still not the end of the world IMO.
[/quote]

How did you guys get this information?

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 09:11 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 10:08 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-15-2013, 12:59 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 02:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Cardinal96 - 01-15-2013, 02:13 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-15-2013, 06:02 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-15-2013, 07:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-15-2013, 08:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-15-2013, 08:25 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 10:05 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-15-2013, 10:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-15-2013, 11:28 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-16-2013, 01:10 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-16-2013, 07:27 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-16-2013, 05:44 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 10:15 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-17-2013, 10:28 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by PrinceLightfoot - 01-17-2013, 11:04 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 04:53 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-17-2013, 05:08 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 05:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 07:42 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 07:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 08:16 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 08:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:01 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-17-2013, 09:19 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-17-2013, 10:27 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 12:43 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 01-18-2013, 08:07 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-18-2013, 10:19 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-18-2013, 11:32 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by DC - 01-18-2013, 07:29 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by socalstanfan1 - 01-19-2013, 12:54 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Renaissance Man - 01-22-2013, 12:20 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stupac2 - 02-01-2013, 10:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 02-01-2013, 12:12 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by oman - 02-01-2013, 10:52 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 02-02-2013, 12:24 PM

Chandler Dorrell - by ChicagoCard - 01-26-2013, 03:00 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 05:38 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-26-2013, 05:49 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by OutsiderFan - 01-26-2013, 06:18 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-26-2013, 09:55 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 01:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:22 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-27-2013, 10:58 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 12:15 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by washingtonismoney - 01-27-2013, 01:14 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-27-2013, 05:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-27-2013, 05:31 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by slide - 01-27-2013, 07:03 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-27-2013, 10:22 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by stan01 - 01-28-2013, 04:09 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by StannyBoy - 01-28-2013, 04:24 PM

Re: the quality of this class - by Bruce Wang - 01-29-2013, 07:51 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by Extra Point - 01-29-2013, 10:31 AM

Re: the quality of this class - by yvonne - 01-31-2013, 05:04 PM

View a Printable Version