[burger]

?Burger: "we blew that 18 point lead" is your first comment?  I don't think I've ever seen a basketball game in which the score-gap only got larger throughout an entire game (to the contrary, most coaches and analysts would suggest that most games feature multiple "runs" by both teams, during which leads narrow, widen, or leads even change); but your thought process starts with evaluating our performance relative to its absolute apex?  An 11 point win wasn't enough?  Gotta maintain your widest margin into perpetuity?

Huh, I guess you missed the part where I praised the team for maintaining the lead and went on the use the phrase "lock for the Tourney" to refer to Stanford (assuming we keep playing well, of course).  I hate being taken out of context.

[burger]

?Burger: "we blew that 18 point lead" is your first comment?  I don't think I've ever seen a basketball game in which the score-gap only got larger throughout an entire game (to the contrary, most coaches and analysts would suggest that most games feature multiple "runs" by both teams, during which leads narrow, widen, or leads even change); but your thought process starts with evaluating our performance relative to its absolute apex?  An 11 point win wasn't enough?  Gotta maintain your widest margin into perpetuity?

Huh, I guess you missed the part where I praised the team for maintaining the lead and went on the use the phrase "lock for the Tourney" to refer to Stanford (assuming we keep playing well, of course).  I hate being taken out of context.