The Academic Progress Rate is based on players staying eligible and staying in school. It's not based on graduation. As long as a school can keep players eligible, its APR should be OK. The Oklahomas of the world are pretty good at doing whatever they need to do to keep players eligible, so they usually have decent APRs. The schools that get into trouble with APRs and are hit with penalties usually are the "have nots" -- schools such as Savannah State, Alabama State, Mississippi Valley State, etc. I'm not a fan of the APR as an academic metric because it's based on the ability of the school to keep players eligible, even if they aren't really making meaningful progress. I prefer to focus on graduation. But the NCAA uses the APR to impose penalties, so it's relevant for that reason.
The top APRs among major conference football programs are:
992Â Duke
991Â Northwestern
989Â Wisconsin
984Â Stanford
983Â Georgia Tech
983Â Clemson
981Â Boston College
The worst APRs among major football programs are:
929Â Oklahoma St.
932Â Texas Tech
932Â Tennessee
935Â Arkansas
937Â Kentucky
938Â C'al
938Â North Carolina
Oklahoma St. was the only major conference school to be penalized. It was hit with a reduction of practice time, but not with a bowl ban.
The only FBS school hit with a bowl ban was UNLV. The rest of the post-season bans were imposed on FCS schools.
The top APRs among major conference football programs are:
992Â Duke
991Â Northwestern
989Â Wisconsin
984Â Stanford
983Â Georgia Tech
983Â Clemson
981Â Boston College
The worst APRs among major football programs are:
929Â Oklahoma St.
932Â Texas Tech
932Â Tennessee
935Â Arkansas
937Â Kentucky
938Â C'al
938Â North Carolina
Oklahoma St. was the only major conference school to be penalized. It was hit with a reduction of practice time, but not with a bowl ban.
The only FBS school hit with a bowl ban was UNLV. The rest of the post-season bans were imposed on FCS schools.
