[81alum]

Agreed!  Thank you for making this list and pointing out the recruits that are not only interested, but have the grades to get in.  With our admissions standards, we only have a handful of players to choose from every year.

Keep in mind that all I have is that someone, somewhere, in some story, blog or board said that so-and-so "was a good student," and of course what someone thinks they know and whether "good" is actually "Stanford ready" is unknown.  In a couple of cases there was a gpa reported--but even there it might have been before spring grades for the sophomore year were in.  Things like grades are private matters to students, unless they choose to say something public about them.  Their basketball performances on the other hand are public.  In any case, the information that these kids are all great at basketball is without doubt, but their academic profiles is in some cases pretty speculative.  Even so, it can't hurt to be watching these kids very closely.

[81alum]

Agreed!  Thank you for making this list and pointing out the recruits that are not only interested, but have the grades to get in.  With our admissions standards, we only have a handful of players to choose from every year.

Keep in mind that all I have is that someone, somewhere, in some story, blog or board said that so-and-so "was a good student," and of course what someone thinks they know and whether "good" is actually "Stanford ready" is unknown.  In a couple of cases there was a gpa reported--but even there it might have been before spring grades for the sophomore year were in.  Things like grades are private matters to students, unless they choose to say something public about them.  Their basketball performances on the other hand are public.  In any case, the information that these kids are all great at basketball is without doubt, but their academic profiles is in some cases pretty speculative.  Even so, it can't hurt to be watching these kids very closely.