[fullmetal]

Because i dont think golson gets sacked all that much, he is very good at extending plays and avoiding defenders.  So that takes away some of the advantage of stanfords D line being better than nds.  In general thats a good rule, but the term better doesn't define the difference in skill.  So even though a teams D line is better than another teams D line, that doesnt specify if they are just 10% better of 80% better. 

Overall, i think golson can naturalize alot of the difference and (even though i get slammed for this) i think NDs WRs are better, so with golson buying time, the receivers get open and make plans.

So that is how i can still say ND wins.

Did you farm out your football posts to non-native English speaking contract workers?  I mean, posting from a smartphone is one thing, but grammar and spell check...eesh.

Anyway, you're banking on the chance that Golson isn't going to get sacked and that our DBs can't cover.  I would disagree, but this is why the games are played.

[fullmetal]

Because i dont think golson gets sacked all that much, he is very good at extending plays and avoiding defenders.  So that takes away some of the advantage of stanfords D line being better than nds.  In general thats a good rule, but the term better doesn't define the difference in skill.  So even though a teams D line is better than another teams D line, that doesnt specify if they are just 10% better of 80% better. 

Overall, i think golson can naturalize alot of the difference and (even though i get slammed for this) i think NDs WRs are better, so with golson buying time, the receivers get open and make plans.

So that is how i can still say ND wins.

Did you farm out your football posts to non-native English speaking contract workers?  I mean, posting from a smartphone is one thing, but grammar and spell check...eesh.

Anyway, you're banking on the chance that Golson isn't going to get sacked and that our DBs can't cover.  I would disagree, but this is why the games are played.