09-28-2019, 12:41 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2019, 03:06 PM by Viking_Guy.)
Game's in about 30 minutes, but I had to comment beforehand.
What the hell is the Pac-12 Network thinking? It's a game between 2 of the top 5 teams in the country. It will shape the rest of the season. They have a production crew there.
And the main Pac-12 network is showing... a 20 year old repeat of a Stanford-Oregon State game (2000), and then game in 60 minutes repeat of Stanford-Oregon State 2017. The women's soccer game is relegated to regional coverage on Pac-12 Bay Area and LA.
Um, yeah.
Seriously, I get that the repeats may draw a larger audience than a women's soccer match, though it pains me. But do Larry Scott and company think a whole lot of people outside the Stanford and Oregon State fan bases would be more interested in those presentations than a live game, and will grow their viewership beyond its current limits?
VG
Okay, a more on-point comment.
The interesting matchup today is Hocking and McKeown against Girma and Hiatt, hopefully supported by whoever's back at holding mid. I'm betting that SC will be able to disrupt our possession, but will be interested in seeing how the Cardinal respond - working through the middle, with Macario dropping deeper, or over the top. I think that SC's backline is too solid for the second option to be very successful, and with DeMelo being out with an Achilles injury, the midfield should hold some opportunity. And at least force SC's midfield to defend our midfield, rather than dropping back to smother Stanford's attack.
Oh, and who will defend McKeown in the air? She’s a major threat on set pieces, and we haven’t shown well there.
Time to watch,
VG
What the hell is the Pac-12 Network thinking? It's a game between 2 of the top 5 teams in the country. It will shape the rest of the season. They have a production crew there.
And the main Pac-12 network is showing... a 20 year old repeat of a Stanford-Oregon State game (2000), and then game in 60 minutes repeat of Stanford-Oregon State 2017. The women's soccer game is relegated to regional coverage on Pac-12 Bay Area and LA.
Um, yeah.
Seriously, I get that the repeats may draw a larger audience than a women's soccer match, though it pains me. But do Larry Scott and company think a whole lot of people outside the Stanford and Oregon State fan bases would be more interested in those presentations than a live game, and will grow their viewership beyond its current limits?
VG
Okay, a more on-point comment.
The interesting matchup today is Hocking and McKeown against Girma and Hiatt, hopefully supported by whoever's back at holding mid. I'm betting that SC will be able to disrupt our possession, but will be interested in seeing how the Cardinal respond - working through the middle, with Macario dropping deeper, or over the top. I think that SC's backline is too solid for the second option to be very successful, and with DeMelo being out with an Achilles injury, the midfield should hold some opportunity. And at least force SC's midfield to defend our midfield, rather than dropping back to smother Stanford's attack.
Oh, and who will defend McKeown in the air? She’s a major threat on set pieces, and we haven’t shown well there.
Time to watch,
VG
