Posts: 1,611
Threads: 208
Joined: Dec 1969
To be honest, BC, that concerns me. Game experience for your goalkeeper becomes more important as the opposition improves exponentially. Again, last year's second goal to FSU just haunts me.
Reading the gostanford writeup, the 15 goals were an NCAA tournament record by a full five goals, and a Stanford team record by 4.
A couple of other thoughts:
(1) I actively wondered why Macario came BACK into the game in the 65th minute ahead 10-0. I THINK that it might be the roster size limit for the tournament - it feels like our "active" roster was 19 or 20, because both Prairie View and Stanford played 17 field players; they also played their second keeper, while Stanford didn't. I can't see any other reason why Macario is on the field that late in a rout. But I couldn't find documentation of NCAA tournament roster limits.
(2) I'm of two minds about how the game went. In one sense, Stanford kept playing positive soccer. In another, they beat up on a supine opponent.
The story goes that, when North Carolina was leagues better than the teams they were playing, Anson Dorrance had two rules. One, that if they were up by 5 or 6 goals, the Tar Heels had to play "two touch" soccer. In other words, no dribbling - only passing and shooting. If they got ahead by nine goals, they weren't allowed to shoot; they were supposed to work the ball to an opponent's endline, turn around, and come back to midfield, then do it again. At least some variant of that.
Personally, I've always thought that would be more insulting as an opponent than continuing to score. But what do people think?
One caveat: having been a keeper through some routs (I once had a game where my team ended up playing 7 on 11 due to injuries, and I think I faced about 50 shots over the course of game), there is one limit to that. When the other team's players start trying "trick" shots - scorpion kicks, lifting the ball up so they can hit a volley, or other egotistical displays. Those sorts of players went into my "little book" of people to be greeted rudely if they came after me on a lofted ball.
(3) It was nice to have a fun game, but either Hofstra or Loyola will be much more serious business. Hofstra, as I mentioned in an earlier thread, is DRAMATICALLY underseeded by RPI - they ended up #16 in the RPI, which means they should have been our opponents in the final 16, not the final 32. Part of that is artifact - they lost to the good teams they played: 6-0 to Penn State, 4-1 to Rutgers, and 2-1 to Brown, and the second-ranked team in the CAA was Delaware at #95.
That said, I am going to try to catch a stream of their game tomorrow morning at 10 am PST.
(4) Really nice to see Caetano-Ferrara going off, given her role in Macario's adaptation to the United States, and subsequent decision to attend Stanford.
Hoping our football team can outscore our futbol team,
VG