05-15-2020, 03:08 PM
good summary of the state of US contact tracing by state
https://testandtrace.com/?utm_campaign=s...ialnetwork
https://testandtrace.com/?utm_campaign=s...ialnetwork
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
US contact tracing
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
good summary of the state of US contact tracing by state
https://testandtrace.com/?utm_campaign=s...ialnetwork
https://testandtrace.com/?utm_campaign=s...ialnetwork
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"
05-15-2020, 04:51 PM
(05-15-2020, 03:16 PM)BostonCard Wrote: I was expecting a 404.
BC
Well, in California, it would appear to be close to "not found". It would appear these are state level numbers only, based on California saying they want 20000. It may be with county level people included we are in much better shape. If we are really at < 20% of what the minimum staff should be at this late date, a) We aren't going to be ready to relax restrictions until ??? and 2) Many heads should roll at both the state and county level. "They" have had adequate time to staff up. There was no uncertainty about the need to do so, so it can't be said they didn't know. If they weren't going to be ready because of budgets or whatever else, transparency was required. They needed to say so. If they weren't going to be ready for "the dance", many will (rightly) question the application of the hammer, and for sure will rebel against it's continued application.
(05-15-2020, 03:16 PM)BostonCard Wrote: I was expecting a 404.
BC
Well, in California, it would appear to be close to "not found". It would appear these are state level numbers only, based on California saying they want 20000. It may be with county level people included we are in much better shape. If we are really at < 20% of what the minimum staff should be at this late date, a) We aren't going to be ready to relax restrictions until ??? and 2) Many heads should roll at both the state and county level. "They" have had adequate time to staff up. There was no uncertainty about the need to do so, so it can't be said they didn't know. If they weren't going to be ready because of budgets or whatever else, transparency was required. They needed to say so. If they weren't going to be ready for "the dance", many will (rightly) question the application of the hammer, and for sure will rebel against it's continued application.
05-17-2020, 09:39 PM
In New Orleans, our restaurants are required to collect customer names and telephone numbers for potential use in contract tracing. Seems sensible to me.
Geaux Cardinal!
Geaux Cardinal!
In New Orleans, our restaurants are required to collect customer names and telephone numbers for potential use in contract tracing. Seems sensible to me.
Geaux Cardinal!
Geaux Cardinal!
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »