10-06-2020, 01:46 AM
Who knows, but I'd go with 4-3, maybe 5-2 if everything falls into place.
Predicated on Mills staying healthy.
Predicated on Mills staying healthy.
Poll: How many Pac-12 wins will Stanford Football have in 2020? - You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
7 wins -- Pac-12 Champion!
7.32%
3
7.32%
6 wins -- Pac-12 Champion!
7.32%
3
7.32%
6 wins -- Pac-12 North Champion, Conference Runner Up :-)
2.44%
1
2.44%
5 wins
19.51%
8
19.51%
4 wins
31.71%
13
31.71%
3 wins
19.51%
8
19.51%
2 wins
7.32%
3
7.32%
1 win
2.44%
1
2.44%
Season will not be completed
2.44%
1
2.44%
* You voted for this item.
Show Results
Stanford Pac-12 Football
Who knows, but I'd go with 4-3, maybe 5-2 if everything falls into place.
Predicated on Mills staying healthy.
Predicated on Mills staying healthy.
10-06-2020, 05:49 AM
4 wins -
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
4 wins -
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
10-06-2020, 09:26 AM
Hey Sam has Sinclair gained any weight? Still listed at 207. He is going to get killed if he is still that small.
10-06-2020, 03:11 PM
(10-05-2020, 03:44 PM)murky Wrote: I don't have a clear picture of which players area available for us, but my impression was we lost people, or lack replacements, at key positions.
Are you saying your outlook is . . . .murky.
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
10-06-2020, 04:07 PM
(10-06-2020, 09:26 AM)Phogge Wrote: Hey Sam has Sinclair gained any weight? Still listed at 207. He is going to get killed if he is still that small.
He was listed at 209 a couple months ago which seems small. (Then again Ryan Johnson is listed at 265 and he's at 280 right now. These weights were prior to the summer and I don't think they get updated again.)
We also don't know what differences in scheme new ILB coach Sanders will run. His first few ILB offers were lanky (200-210) and fast. Seems like he's gonna LOVE Sinclair if that's what he's looking for.
(10-06-2020, 09:26 AM)Phogge Wrote: Hey Sam has Sinclair gained any weight? Still listed at 207. He is going to get killed if he is still that small.
He was listed at 209 a couple months ago which seems small. (Then again Ryan Johnson is listed at 265 and he's at 280 right now. These weights were prior to the summer and I don't think they get updated again.)
We also don't know what differences in scheme new ILB coach Sanders will run. His first few ILB offers were lanky (200-210) and fast. Seems like he's gonna LOVE Sinclair if that's what he's looking for.
10-06-2020, 04:08 PM
(10-06-2020, 03:11 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:(10-05-2020, 03:44 PM)murky Wrote: I don't have a clear picture of which players area available for us, but my impression was we lost people, or lack replacements, at key positions.
Are you saying your outlook is . . . .murky.
Nice one. I for one am not above the lowest form of humor.
(10-06-2020, 03:11 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:(10-05-2020, 03:44 PM)murky Wrote: I don't have a clear picture of which players area available for us, but my impression was we lost people, or lack replacements, at key positions.
Are you saying your outlook is . . . .murky.
Nice one. I for one am not above the lowest form of humor.
10-07-2020, 12:13 PM
(10-06-2020, 05:49 AM)Farm93 Wrote: 4 wins -
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
I second this guess, with the hope that there is a 7th game and it's with one of the southerns that Stanford can beat. 5-2 is a good season this year.
Full disclosure: I root for Stanford, Oregon, and Notre Dame. I have degrees from all three. When they play each other I root for 1.) whichever has a chance for playoffs; or 2.) whichever is losing
(10-06-2020, 05:49 AM)Farm93 Wrote: 4 wins -
4-2 with a belief that the 7th game will not happen for those not in the CG.
Losses to UW and Oregon.
It is possible that COVID issues at other schools could get almost any team to become Pac-12 champs.
It will be a crazy season, just hope that everyone stays safe.
I second this guess, with the hope that there is a 7th game and it's with one of the southerns that Stanford can beat. 5-2 is a good season this year.
Full disclosure: I root for Stanford, Oregon, and Notre Dame. I have degrees from all three. When they play each other I root for 1.) whichever has a chance for playoffs; or 2.) whichever is losing
10-07-2020, 12:41 PM
Pac-12 media poll has Stanford 4th in the Pac-12 North, above only OSU and WSU. Crossover game would be against UCLA (#4 in the South). So the media pick would be 2-5 or 3-4.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
Pac-12 media poll has Stanford 4th in the Pac-12 North, above only OSU and WSU. Crossover game would be against UCLA (#4 in the South). So the media pick would be 2-5 or 3-4.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
10-07-2020, 01:10 PM
(10-07-2020, 12:41 PM)Papa John Wrote: Pac-12 media poll has Stanford 4th in the Pac-12 North, above only OSU and WSU. Crossover game would be against UCLA (#4 in the South). So the media pick would be 2-5 or 3-4.
Sadly probably pretty accurate. There's some upside in that prediction, and a lot of downside (if Mills gets injured).
BC
(10-07-2020, 12:41 PM)Papa John Wrote: Pac-12 media poll has Stanford 4th in the Pac-12 North, above only OSU and WSU. Crossover game would be against UCLA (#4 in the South). So the media pick would be 2-5 or 3-4.
Sadly probably pretty accurate. There's some upside in that prediction, and a lot of downside (if Mills gets injured).
BC
10-07-2020, 06:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2020, 06:20 PM by JustAnotherFan.)
Season will not be completed
(This post was last modified: 10-07-2020, 06:20 PM by JustAnotherFan.)
Season will not be completed
10-08-2020, 08:27 PM
When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
10-08-2020, 08:31 PM
(10-08-2020, 08:27 PM)French Rage Wrote: When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
The seventh game is a conference game against the south. So if we finish first, we'll play the first place south team; if we finish fourth, we'll play against the fourth place south team, etc.
BC
(10-08-2020, 08:27 PM)French Rage Wrote: When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
The seventh game is a conference game against the south. So if we finish first, we'll play the first place south team; if we finish fourth, we'll play against the fourth place south team, etc.
BC
10-09-2020, 02:08 PM
(10-08-2020, 08:31 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(10-08-2020, 08:27 PM)French Rage Wrote: When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
The seventh game is a conference game against the south. So if we finish first, we'll play the first place south team; if we finish fourth, we'll play against the fourth place south team, etc.
BC
Ahh, OK, I missed all that, my bad.
(10-08-2020, 08:31 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(10-08-2020, 08:27 PM)French Rage Wrote: When people say 4-3, what is the 7th game? A bowl game? 90% of the bowl games barely break even now, with fans. Considering how little chance there is of them having more than a smattering, are we really assume anything outside of the NY6 are going to bother. What is the point of having two 3-3 teams play with no fans? Who makes money off of that?
The seventh game is a conference game against the south. So if we finish first, we'll play the first place south team; if we finish fourth, we'll play against the fourth place south team, etc.
BC
Ahh, OK, I missed all that, my bad.
10-10-2020, 05:20 PM
Bumping this to confirm that the poll functionality at the top is now working fine.
10-10-2020, 05:39 PM
I'm going with 3-3. I have no idea what will happen in the last game because I don't know who they'll play or whether it will be home or away.
3-0 at home, 0-3 on the road
3-0 at home, 0-3 on the road
The pessimistic devil on my shoulder says Stanford is 1-2 or 1-3 when the season is cancelled due to Covid.
But the optmistic angel on my other shoulder — surging with hope and possibly juiced up on dexamethasone — says 6-1 (or even 5-1) conference champion, with another win in Pasadena!!!
An honest case can be made for either outcome.
But the optmistic angel on my other shoulder — surging with hope and possibly juiced up on dexamethasone — says 6-1 (or even 5-1) conference champion, with another win in Pasadena!!!
An honest case can be made for either outcome.
(This post was last modified: 10-11-2020, 07:05 PM by Snorlax94.)
The pessimistic devil on my shoulder says Stanford is 1-2 or 1-3 when the season is cancelled due to Covid.
But the optmistic angel on my other shoulder — surging with hope and possibly juiced up on dexamethasone — says 6-1 (or even 5-1) conference champion, with another win in Pasadena!!!
An honest case can be made for either outcome.
But the optmistic angel on my other shoulder — surging with hope and possibly juiced up on dexamethasone — says 6-1 (or even 5-1) conference champion, with another win in Pasadena!!!
An honest case can be made for either outcome.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »