(12-20-2020, 12:11 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Honestly, had the NCAA just said, "Given the severity of COVID-19 situation in Southern California we would like to do our part to prevent further burden on the LA area and are moving the National Semifinal", it would have been colossally disingenuous and hypocritical, but at least it would have acknowledged that public health orders are at least nominally important to follow. Instead the message is "if you don't like the restrictions in one jurisdiction, it is totally fine to go to another jurisdiction with looser restrictions". It's an awful message, and it is why so many of us are sick and tired of following the rules; we view it as hopeless, and we see that if you are influential enough, the rules don't apply to you (and yes, the Governor hosting a party at the French Laundry absolutely fits with that).
BC
I don't "get" the distinction as meaningful in any way, particularly to the population at large.
Most/nearly all folks will view this as the game being moved, for health regulations, to a venue where F&F can attend a national semifinal game. No one will know whether the Rose Bowl said "no one may attend," or if it was Pasadena city or county officials who kiboshed it, or if it was the governor's office. Nor will anyone care.
That strikes me as an acceptable path - one that honors CA's dire situation, and the pretty legit interest of player families to attend such a momentous game, particularly given that attendance at the game itself does not appear high-risk (the ancillaries, of course, are more risky).
Agree that governor's "priorities" are a separate matter - and I didn't know that commercials and other things were being filmed in studios.
P.S. Will they still say the game is being played at "the Rose Bowl," somewhat akin to the Maui Invitational being played in Asheville, NC?