[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[dabigv13]

I think its much more likely being leaked from the kids themselves.

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[yvonne]

not according to Bonagura's tweets.

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...6211815424

http://twitter.com/#!/KyleBonagura/statu...0497841152

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[socalstanfan1]

I think it's a little nervy for the CardBoard to be denouncing anybody for talking about the admissions status of recruits. We do it all the time and have done so since the dawn of CardBoard time. And before that, a lot of us did it on another board.

I think there is a big difference between "talking about" whether a student has been accepted or not, and discussing what he might do as a result (something I assume fans who are interested in recruiting do all the time), and announcing via twitter that you know an applicant has been rejected.  My first thought at the tweets about Odenigbo is that it is particularly bad since it was announced that he had not passed admissions.  Sharing news that one would no doubt be proud of, such as being admitted, seems not so bad.  But on further reflection, I think any such information should be announced only by the student and his family, even if the news is positive. 

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[FarmBoy]

One of Kyle B's tweets:

Ifeadi Odenigbo, a 4-star OLB recruit from Ohio, was denied admission to #Stanford according to a Stanford source.

Sure sounds like he's getting info from the university directly... It may not be sanctioned by the administration, but it sounds like there's at least a leak.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.

[CompSci87]

We don't really know what he means by "a Stanford source." I don't think that necessarily means someone who works for the university. And not necessarily someone with hard information either.