Posts: 7,464
Threads: 912
Joined: Jan 2018
Reading the coaching speculation under the article got me thinking about what happens to Cal coaches after they leave.
In the last 25 years:
Kapp - became general manager of the BC Lions; fired after 11 games
Snyder - coached Arizona State for nine seasons with a to58-45 record (40-32 in conference), including appearances in the Rose (loss), Sun (victory), and Aloha Bowls (two losses).
Gilbertson - bounced around in positions with Seattle Seahawks and the University of Washington; 7-16 in his only subsequent head coaching job, at UW; currently a scout with the Cleveland Browns
Mariucci - Spent nine years as an NFL coach, earning a .518 regular season and .429 post-season record, best season was his first season, which ended in a loss in the NFC championship game
Holmoe - became an associate athletic director at his alma mater and was then promoted to athletic director
Tedford - ??
Only Mariucci and maybe Snyder had a modicum of success. Now, this is a case where correlation doesn't equal causality; the bad coaches didn't end up moving on to better careers. On the other hand, that record does create a perception. Coaches don't go from Cal to better positions, so potential coaches may not perceive the job as a stepping stone or positive career move.
In that same time period, Stanford has had two coaches move to the NFL, one coach go on to a more prestigious NCAA position. One of the losing coaches had already become an NFL legend following an earlier stint at Stanford, and even one of the abject failures is now a successful coach at a lower level.