08-28-2014, 02:47 PM
Regular season only.
Poll: What will the regular season record be? - You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
12-0
20.29%
14
20.29%
11-1
18.84%
13
18.84%
10-2
31.88%
22
31.88%
9-3
24.64%
17
24.64%
8-4
4.35%
3
4.35%
7-5
0%
0
0%
6-6
0%
0
0%
5-7
0%
0
0%
4-8
0%
0
0%
3-9
0%
0
0%
2-10
0%
0
0%
1-11
0%
0
0%
0-12
0%
0
0%
* You voted for this item.
Show Results
It's time: project the season record
08-28-2014, 02:51 PM
By the by, here's my vote and logic:
UCD: 99%
SC: 65%
Army: 99%
UW: 70%
ND: 70% (assuming 5 players are out)
WSU: 85%
ASU: 65%
OSU: 75%
Oregon: 35%
Utah: 85%
59ers: 95%
UCLA: 50%
= 8.93 (I rounded down because I assume I'm overoptimistic)
UCD: 99%
SC: 65%
Army: 99%
UW: 70%
ND: 70% (assuming 5 players are out)
WSU: 85%
ASU: 65%
OSU: 75%
Oregon: 35%
Utah: 85%
59ers: 95%
UCLA: 50%
= 8.93 (I rounded down because I assume I'm overoptimistic)
By the by, here's my vote and logic:
UCD: 99%
SC: 65%
Army: 99%
UW: 70%
ND: 70% (assuming 5 players are out)
WSU: 85%
ASU: 65%
OSU: 75%
Oregon: 35%
Utah: 85%
59ers: 95%
UCLA: 50%
= 8.93 (I rounded down because I assume I'm overoptimistic)
UCD: 99%
SC: 65%
Army: 99%
UW: 70%
ND: 70% (assuming 5 players are out)
WSU: 85%
ASU: 65%
OSU: 75%
Oregon: 35%
Utah: 85%
59ers: 95%
UCLA: 50%
= 8.93 (I rounded down because I assume I'm overoptimistic)
08-28-2014, 02:56 PM
I voted 10-2. Loss at Oregon, then we either get jobbed at N.otre Dam.e or loss to UCLA end of season. Gun to my head, I say get jobbed at U of DFG
Audaces fortuna iuvat
08-28-2014, 03:04 PM
It's a discrete poll by definition since we're using integer values. C'mon! :p
08-28-2014, 03:12 PM
11-1, with the possibility that we still win the PAC 12 and go to the CFB Playoff. On paper, I think we should be able to win every game. Football isn't played on paper, however, so I think we will drop one along the way. It wouldn't surprise me if it is against one of our (somewhat) lesser opponents like Oregon State or Washington.
11-1, with the possibility that we still win the PAC 12 and go to the CFB Playoff. On paper, I think we should be able to win every game. Football isn't played on paper, however, so I think we will drop one along the way. It wouldn't surprise me if it is against one of our (somewhat) lesser opponents like Oregon State or Washington.
08-28-2014, 03:29 PM
Do you mean this poll is out there by itself...set apart from all other polls? I think that makes you a pollist.
Do you mean this poll is out there by itself...set apart from all other polls? I think that makes you a pollist.
08-28-2014, 03:41 PM
I'm not responsible for the terminology! I think the writer meant discreet, but perhaps, it's some polling term that I'm not familiar with. Part of the software's documentation I think it's the Good Post/Bad Post add-on, but I can't remember drives me crazy because it uses "amount" when it should be using "number."
I'm not responsible for the terminology! I think the writer meant discreet, but perhaps, it's some polling term that I'm not familiar with. Part of the software's documentation I think it's the Good Post/Bad Post add-on, but I can't remember drives me crazy because it uses "amount" when it should be using "number."
08-28-2014, 05:48 PM
(08-28-2014, 04:20 PM)Publius link Wrote:12-0.
12 - 0 isn't the whole season, if you're correct.
“Tact is the ability to tell someone to go to Hell in such a way that they look forward to the trip." W. Churchill
08-28-2014, 06:56 PM
I +1 Publius' post for repping VM. I knew there was something I liked about you...
08-28-2014, 07:25 PM
(08-28-2014, 03:41 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:I'm not responsible for the terminology! I think the writer meant discreet, but perhaps, it's some polling term that I'm not familiar with. Part of the software's documentation I think it's the Good Post/Bad Post add-on, but I can't remember drives me crazy because it uses "amount" when it should be using "number."
I'll try to find a minute to grep for those terms and fix them.
(08-28-2014, 03:41 PM)Yvonne link Wrote:I'm not responsible for the terminology! I think the writer meant discreet, but perhaps, it's some polling term that I'm not familiar with. Part of the software's documentation I think it's the Good Post/Bad Post add-on, but I can't remember drives me crazy because it uses "amount" when it should be using "number."
I'll try to find a minute to grep for those terms and fix them.
08-28-2014, 10:43 PM
I'm sure the software authors meant "discreet", but that word isn't terribly apt either, so I changed it to semi-private.
I'm sure the software authors meant "discreet", but that word isn't terribly apt either, so I changed it to semi-private.
08-29-2014, 06:33 AM
(08-28-2014, 06:56 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:I +1 Publius' post for repping VM. I knew there was something I liked about you...
Finally got around to watching the movie. The coolest fictional Stanford person of all time. There's actually a funny Stanford VM quote as related to the football team, but it's not an elegant quip for a more civilized board.
(08-29-2014, 04:43 AM)garvin link Wrote:I said 9-3, but now have buyer's remorse and wish I had gone for 10-2.
I recall garvin being the lone optimist ahead of the 2012 season. Come on, put in 12-0 for good luck.
(08-28-2014, 06:56 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:I +1 Publius' post for repping VM. I knew there was something I liked about you...
Finally got around to watching the movie. The coolest fictional Stanford person of all time. There's actually a funny Stanford VM quote as related to the football team, but it's not an elegant quip for a more civilized board.
(08-29-2014, 04:43 AM)garvin link Wrote:I said 9-3, but now have buyer's remorse and wish I had gone for 10-2.
I recall garvin being the lone optimist ahead of the 2012 season. Come on, put in 12-0 for good luck.
08-29-2014, 07:28 AM
I went with the odds and said 9-3, although I could not really say which will be the 9 and which the three. Maybe I am pessimistic since I just rewatched the Utah game the other night, and that really had a way of reducing hubris.
08-29-2014, 07:39 AM
Wilner has us going 10 and 2, with losses to Oregon State and UCLA.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ictions-2/
As much as I dislike his columns on occasion, he was very accurate last season. Where I think he gets it wrong in his predictions this year is wrt UCLA. The Bruins will be coming off an emotional game with the USC, and if we are as I suspect fighting for a spot in the PAC 12CG/CFP, I don't see us losing.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ictions-2/
As much as I dislike his columns on occasion, he was very accurate last season. Where I think he gets it wrong in his predictions this year is wrt UCLA. The Bruins will be coming off an emotional game with the USC, and if we are as I suspect fighting for a spot in the PAC 12CG/CFP, I don't see us losing.
Wilner has us going 10 and 2, with losses to Oregon State and UCLA.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ictions-2/
As much as I dislike his columns on occasion, he was very accurate last season. Where I think he gets it wrong in his predictions this year is wrt UCLA. The Bruins will be coming off an emotional game with the USC, and if we are as I suspect fighting for a spot in the PAC 12CG/CFP, I don't see us losing.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegespor...ictions-2/
As much as I dislike his columns on occasion, he was very accurate last season. Where I think he gets it wrong in his predictions this year is wrt UCLA. The Bruins will be coming off an emotional game with the USC, and if we are as I suspect fighting for a spot in the PAC 12CG/CFP, I don't see us losing.
StanFan88
Unregistered
Unregistered
08-29-2014, 08:19 AM
I'm going bold - and perhaps in some minds a bit ridiculous
Stanford will be 12-0 this season and Ty Montgomery will win the Voldemort.Â
The ONLY game on the schedule that genuinely concerns me is Autzen. I really hope both teams are undefeated on Oct 30.
Stanford will be 12-0 this season and Ty Montgomery will win the Voldemort.Â
The ONLY game on the schedule that genuinely concerns me is Autzen. I really hope both teams are undefeated on Oct 30.
I'm going bold - and perhaps in some minds a bit ridiculous
Stanford will be 12-0 this season and Ty Montgomery will win the Voldemort.Â
The ONLY game on the schedule that genuinely concerns me is Autzen. I really hope both teams are undefeated on Oct 30.
Stanford will be 12-0 this season and Ty Montgomery will win the Voldemort.Â
The ONLY game on the schedule that genuinely concerns me is Autzen. I really hope both teams are undefeated on Oct 30.
08-29-2014, 09:44 AM
I'm going with a repeat of recent history and voting 10-2, with the two losses coming on the road. Stanford finishes in a tie with Oregon atop the Pac-12 North but reps the North in the Pac-12 Championship Game based on the head-to-head tiebreaker.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
I'm going with a repeat of recent history and voting 10-2, with the two losses coming on the road. Stanford finishes in a tie with Oregon atop the Pac-12 North but reps the North in the Pac-12 Championship Game based on the head-to-head tiebreaker.
If there's one thing people have learned in Berkeley, it's that you can't put "Cal football" and "Rose Bowl" in the same sentence. The words just don't fit. You'd be better off linking "covered wagons" with "Mars travel." (Bruce Jenkins, Cal '70, SF Chronicle, Nov. 11, 2017)
08-29-2014, 09:51 AM
(08-29-2014, 04:43 AM)garvin link Wrote:I said 9-3, but now have buyer's remorse and wish I had gone for 10-2.
Same here. I have a hard time actually seeing the third loss on the schedule, but am trying to keep my expectations in check.
(08-29-2014, 04:43 AM)garvin link Wrote:I said 9-3, but now have buyer's remorse and wish I had gone for 10-2.
Same here. I have a hard time actually seeing the third loss on the schedule, but am trying to keep my expectations in check.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »