[washingtonismoney]

While the number four BCS rating is real nice, I think we can all agree we\'d prefer to go to Pasadena of all of the BCS destinations. That means we want an Auburn loss. (Interestingly, a few of the panelists on the BCS show had Stanford ranked #3 and seemed to be arguing that TCU would be unworthy of a national championship spot should Auburn lose, which would seem to argue that we should be in the national championship ahead of TCU in the event of an Auburn loss, which seems implausible but gratifying). Anyway, looking at the Sagarin PREDICTOR rankings, he has the Gamecocks ranked ever so slightly ahead of Auburn, which is good right?

(Oh by the way: who\'s the best team in the land, according to the Sagarin PREDICTOR rankings?
...
...
...
Stanford.)

[washingtonismoney]

While the number four BCS rating is real nice, I think we can all agree we\'d prefer to go to Pasadena of all of the BCS destinations. That means we want an Auburn loss. (Interestingly, a few of the panelists on the BCS show had Stanford ranked #3 and seemed to be arguing that TCU would be unworthy of a national championship spot should Auburn lose, which would seem to argue that we should be in the national championship ahead of TCU in the event of an Auburn loss, which seems implausible but gratifying). Anyway, looking at the Sagarin PREDICTOR rankings, he has the Gamecocks ranked ever so slightly ahead of Auburn, which is good right?

(Oh by the way: who\'s the best team in the land, according to the Sagarin PREDICTOR rankings?
...
...
...
Stanford.)