[washingtonismoney]

http://www.ruleoftree.com/2014/12/30/746...l-probably

The Foster Farms demolishment (plus, perhaps, the bowl performance of N.D.) has pushed Stanford up to 17th in Sagarin's PREDICTOR since the article was written. Don't think the other ratings systems have adjusted.

(I believe Stanford also went 0/2 in the fumble recoveries category, capping an incredibly bad year in terms of that category.)

[washingtonismoney]

http://www.ruleoftree.com/2014/12/30/746...l-probably

The Foster Farms demolishment (plus, perhaps, the bowl performance of N.D.) has pushed Stanford up to 17th in Sagarin's PREDICTOR since the article was written. Don't think the other ratings systems have adjusted.

(I believe Stanford also went 0/2 in the fumble recoveries category, capping an incredibly bad year in terms of that category.)

[CTcard]

I thought the most interesting bit was that this was the best yards/play differential of the recent era. [Though I thought it a bit odd he described this stat as being "basically in line with past years" - it was quite a bit better than most.]

This again highlights that the biggest Stanford problem was mistakes - as Hulk likes to point out from time to time. Such things really matter to winning football games.

[CTcard]

I thought the most interesting bit was that this was the best yards/play differential of the recent era. [Though I thought it a bit odd he described this stat as being "basically in line with past years" - it was quite a bit better than most.]

This again highlights that the biggest Stanford problem was mistakes - as Hulk likes to point out from time to time. Such things really matter to winning football games.