09-25-2015, 06:07 PM
Looks like Scooby Wright will be playing for 'Zona tomorrow -- which presumably means he'll be playing us next week.
Week 4 in opponents
Looks like Scooby Wright will be playing for 'Zona tomorrow -- which presumably means he'll be playing us next week.
09-25-2015, 06:21 PM
The key question, of course, is how well he'll be playing.
Hopefully he gets all that miracle-performance-immediately-upon-returning stuff out of his system this week.
Hopefully he gets all that miracle-performance-immediately-upon-returning stuff out of his system this week.
09-26-2015, 10:34 AM
(09-25-2015, 06:07 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:Looks like Scooby Wright will be playing for 'Zona tomorrow -- which presumably means he'll be playing us next week.
Ruh-roh.
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
09-26-2015, 10:53 AM
Wow, The fighting Harbaugh's are having their way with BYU. UCLA's close win isn't looking as good; otoh Utah's win over Michigan is looking better.
BC
BC
Wow, The fighting Harbaugh's are having their way with BYU. UCLA's close win isn't looking as good; otoh Utah's win over Michigan is looking better.
BC
BC
09-26-2015, 12:30 PM
(09-26-2015, 10:53 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:UCLA's close win isn't looking as good...
So I didn't actually see the game, but UCLA had very solid underlying statistics -- 6.59 YPP on offense vs. 4.60 on defense. Two YPP difference is the sort of dominance you see in comfortable wins; for contrast, Stanford was at roughly 2.5 ypp difference against Oregon State (7.87 on offense vs. 5.36 on defense).
(09-26-2015, 10:53 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:UCLA's close win isn't looking as good...
So I didn't actually see the game, but UCLA had very solid underlying statistics -- 6.59 YPP on offense vs. 4.60 on defense. Two YPP difference is the sort of dominance you see in comfortable wins; for contrast, Stanford was at roughly 2.5 ypp difference against Oregon State (7.87 on offense vs. 5.36 on defense).
09-26-2015, 01:23 PM
Someone on this board said that Duke wasn't that good after they lost to NW. Now that they've beat GT, I think it's safe to say that they are pretty good. That win will certainly help our SOS.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
09-26-2015, 01:48 PM
(09-26-2015, 12:30 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=12925.msg130964#msg130964 date=1443290035]
UCLA's close win isn't looking as good...
So I didn't actually see the game, but UCLA had very solid underlying statistics -- 6.59 YPP on offense vs. 4.60 on defense. Two YPP difference is the sort of dominance you see in comfortable wins; for contrast, Stanford was at roughly 2.5 ypp difference against Oregon State (7.87 on offense vs. 5.36 on defense).
[/quote]
Rosen looked atrocious (3 picks), but Perkins was a beast.
BC
(09-26-2015, 12:30 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:[quote author=Boston Card link=topic=12925.msg130964#msg130964 date=1443290035]
UCLA's close win isn't looking as good...
So I didn't actually see the game, but UCLA had very solid underlying statistics -- 6.59 YPP on offense vs. 4.60 on defense. Two YPP difference is the sort of dominance you see in comfortable wins; for contrast, Stanford was at roughly 2.5 ypp difference against Oregon State (7.87 on offense vs. 5.36 on defense).
[/quote]
Rosen looked atrocious (3 picks), but Perkins was a beast.
BC
09-26-2015, 02:09 PM
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
ich bin ein UMasser
BC
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
ich bin ein UMasser
BC
09-26-2015, 03:22 PM
UW amazingly has scored 7 points against kal. In the other 4 drives, UW has gone:
--3 and out, -19 yards
--3 and out, -8 yards
--3 plays, -3 yards, fumble
--1 play, 0 yards, interception
Browning's stat line:
0-3 passing, 0 yards, 1 INT, 1 fumble, 3 sacks, -14 yards rushing
--3 and out, -19 yards
--3 and out, -8 yards
--3 plays, -3 yards, fumble
--1 play, 0 yards, interception
Browning's stat line:
0-3 passing, 0 yards, 1 INT, 1 fumble, 3 sacks, -14 yards rushing
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
UW amazingly has scored 7 points against kal. In the other 4 drives, UW has gone:
--3 and out, -19 yards
--3 and out, -8 yards
--3 plays, -3 yards, fumble
--1 play, 0 yards, interception
Browning's stat line:
0-3 passing, 0 yards, 1 INT, 1 fumble, 3 sacks, -14 yards rushing
--3 and out, -19 yards
--3 and out, -8 yards
--3 plays, -3 yards, fumble
--1 play, 0 yards, interception
Browning's stat line:
0-3 passing, 0 yards, 1 INT, 1 fumble, 3 sacks, -14 yards rushing
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
09-26-2015, 03:26 PM
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
34 points later its ND 55. umass 20. Oh well.
BC
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
34 points later its ND 55. umass 20. Oh well.
BC
09-26-2015, 04:57 PM
Browning looks pretty smart/in command now, with the Huskies driving in the beginning of the fourth quarter down 6.
Browning looks pretty smart/in command now, with the Huskies driving in the beginning of the fourth quarter down 6.
09-26-2015, 05:09 PM
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
That was the score when I sat down at a burger place for lunch, and it caught my eye. The Irish scored four touchdowns while we ate.
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
(09-26-2015, 02:01 PM)washingtonismoney link Wrote:N.D. 21
UMass 20
2nd quarter
Hmmmmmmmm
That was the score when I sat down at a burger place for lunch, and it caught my eye. The Irish scored four touchdowns while we ate.
Please clear the field! The game is not over!
09-26-2015, 05:11 PM
I wouldn't call 134 yards passing, -28 yards rushing, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 1 fumble "smart/in command."Â
When I registered here in 2014, TrumpCard seemed like an apolitical user ID...
09-26-2015, 05:16 PM
(09-26-2015, 05:11 PM)TrumpCard link Wrote:I wouldn't call 134 yards passing, -28 yards rushing, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 1 fumble "smart/in command."
Hence "now."
(09-26-2015, 05:11 PM)TrumpCard link Wrote:I wouldn't call 134 yards passing, -28 yards rushing, 0 TDs, 1 INT, 1 fumble "smart/in command."
Hence "now."
09-26-2015, 05:28 PM
Washington gets the ball back down six with three minutes in the game. That they are even in it is crazy, but a 70 yard fumble return for a TD helps things.
BC
BC
Washington gets the ball back down six with three minutes in the game. That they are even in it is crazy, but a 70 yard fumble return for a TD helps things.
BC
BC
09-26-2015, 05:33 PM
Washington's QB promptly throws an interception to kill his team's chances.
Washington's QB promptly throws an interception to kill his team's chances.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »