Stanford-ND prediction thread -
82lsju - 11-23-2015
LSJU 31
the other team 24
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Hulk01 - 11-23-2015
63-0, unless Shaw pulls the first unit after the first series of the third quarter and lets Lohn play fullback and Simmons read the read-option.
If that, I see the visitors who shall not be named manage a garbage time score--63-3, provided he can nail it from 55 yards.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
BostonCard - 11-23-2015
Sequoia sempervirens 42
Amicam mortuis mentioris 28
By the way, no one picked up on my joke in the "Scientific name" for our prior opponent. :(
BC
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
winflop - 11-23-2015
Fighting Shaws 38
Fighting Amish 27
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Hurlburt88 - 11-23-2015
Axe-wielders 31
Frightened Irises 27
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Bruce Wang - 11-23-2015
Papers for Grades 30
Sex for Papers 27
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Cardinal96 - 11-23-2015
Stanford 27
Notre Dame 24
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
JJJ - 11-23-2015
Jet Toner's future team 28
Manti Te'o's old team 20
(could've gone with Luke Kaumatule's current team, but since he likely won't be playing either, went with the future)
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
amartinsu13 - 11-23-2015
(11-23-2015, 09:35 PM)JJJ link Wrote:Jet Toner's future team 28
Manti Te'o's old team 20
(could've gone with Luke Kaumatule's current team, but since he likely won't be playing either, went with the future)
You must be from the 808 :)
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
fullmetal - 11-23-2015
Wind of Freedom 34
Lies, cheating, scandal 17
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
BostonCard - 11-24-2015
(11-23-2015, 07:50 PM)hurlburt88 link Wrote:Frightened Irises 27
Eye am sure they are very afraid.
BC
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
BostonCard - 11-24-2015
Wilner is predicting something like 31-23. I think he's making a bit too much of the Irish injury situation; they've been remarkably resilient. But maybe losing Prosise and Russell are the straws that break the camels back, so to speak.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2015/11/23/stanford-football-grading-the-week-whats-next-a-special-edition/
And FFS, Wilner, it was not a hold.
BC
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
washingtonismoney - 11-24-2015
(11-24-2015, 12:42 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:And FFS, Wilner, it was not a hold.
Forget it, Jake. It's Wilnertown.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Mick - 11-24-2015
Trees       28
Leprechauns  24
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
JJJ - 11-24-2015
(11-23-2015, 09:46 PM)amartinsu13 link Wrote:[quote author=JJJ link=topic=13735.msg143369#msg143369 date=1448339711]
Jet Toner's future team 28
Manti Te'o's old team 20
(could've gone with Luke Kaumatule's current team, but since he likely won't be playing either, went with the future)
You must be from the 808 :)
[/quote]
I'm here at the moment, but not from here. 8)
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
thunder_chik - 11-24-2015
Formerly the Indians, 31
Team from Indiana, 28
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
2 for 2028 - 11-24-2015
Stanford 34
N.D. 24
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
JohnR34231 - 11-24-2015
Silly pie-in-the-sky prediction. Good Guys 45 Domers 14
Realistic prediction (assuming we play our best game of the year) Good Guys 31 Domers 27.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
pcgoode - 11-24-2015
Two evenly matched teams, but Stanford wins 34-30.
I suspect we will see more bend but don't break defense from the Cardinal this weekend.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
stupac2 - 11-24-2015
(11-24-2015, 12:42 AM)Boston Card link Wrote:Wilner is predicting something like 31-23. I think he's making a bit too much of the Irish injury situation; they've been remarkably resilient. But maybe losing Prosise and Russell are the straws that break the camels back, so to speak.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/collegesports/2015/11/23/stanford-football-grading-the-week-whats-next-a-special-edition/
And FFS, Wilner, it was not a hold.
BC
He's a reporter, why doesn't he just ask the league about the call? I doubt it was controversial enough to merit a statement from them without someone bugging them, but bugging them about stuff like that is explicitly his job...