Stanford Baseball 2025/26 - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Baseball 2025/26 (/thread-24952.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford Baseball 2025/26 (/thread-24952.html)
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-08-2025
(04-07-2025, 10:14 PM)JJJ Wrote: Completely forgot to tune in but we beat UC Davis 4-0.
Uploading the game to my Youtube channel now. Should be available by 9pm.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - chrisk - 04-11-2025
Kris Bubic goes into his third start of the season for the Royals tonight with a 0.00 ERA.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-11-2025
Clemson game, bottom 4. This season encapsulated. Runners on 1, 3, 1 out. Runner on first takes off, Saum fires a strike, out. Next pitch: wild. Run 6 scores.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-11-2025
OMG we’re in danger of being run-ruled by Clemson next inning (10-1, B6).
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-11-2025
(04-11-2025, 05:41 PM)JJJ Wrote: OMG we’re in danger of being run-ruled by Clemson next inning (10-1, B6).
IIRC Clemson is #4 in the country. I'm sure that if I misremembered, corrections will be incoming.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - Madera86 - 04-11-2025
We are last or near the bottom of the league in ERA and opposing batting average. Middle of the road (surprisingly, at least to me) in walks, HB and wild pitches. The starting pitching was hit or miss, so to speak, early on, and the bullpen was stellar. Since the break, however, it seems the entire pitching staff has been struggling mightily on the weekends. The offense just seems deflated and can't keep up.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-11-2025
(04-11-2025, 06:04 PM)Madera86 Wrote: We are last or near the bottom of the league in ERA and opposing batting average. Middle of the road (surprisingly, at least to me) in walks, HB and wild pitches. The starting pitching was hit or miss, so to speak, early on, and the bullpen was stellar. Since the break, however, it seems the entire pitching staff has been struggling mightily on the weekends. The offense just seems deflated and can't keep up.
Every single year. Different team after the break.
(04-11-2025, 05:41 PM)JJJ Wrote: OMG we’re in danger of being run-ruled by Clemson next inning (10-1, B6).
I gotta add that the 11th run was a bases loaded HBP in the bottom of the sixth.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - M T - 04-12-2025
(04-11-2025, 07:24 PM)TonyLima Wrote: I gotta add that the 11th run was a bases loaded HBP in the bottom of the sixth.
Shades of the 1st game this week of the double header between teams with 99 and 42 game losing streaks. The winning run was due to a bases loaded HBP in extra innings.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-12-2025
Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - Baller4 - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - drnoodleman - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
!Agree!
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-12-2025
We plate 5 runs T2 (after 2 outs?) including a lucky hit where the RF couldn’t track a high Becerra fly ball, and we’re leading Clemson for the first time, 5-3!
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
Disagree.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-12-2025
Clemson scores 5 B2 to lead 8-5.
Stanford comes back with 2 runs T3 on a 2-out 2-run homer by Haskins (3 for 3 in 3 innings! A triple shy of the cycle!). Apparently, Lim is supposed to pitch B3 (but Esky needed 3 pitchers instead of 1 to eat up the first 2 innings).
Down 8-7 but it’s still a ballgame!
Esky just gave the most awesome interview. Can someone post the video clip? I was literally laughing out loud (as were the announcers). He basically said everything was going according to plan and he credits good coaching (tongue firmly in cheek).
We re-take the lead, 10-8 T4. I’m going to have to open a beer and hunker down for the long haul here.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - Baller4 - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 04:07 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
Disagree.
The starting three were suppose to be the strong point of this team. The Friday starter has been struggling, and the new Friday starter has no control.
Why should he stay??
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-12-2025
2 away, runners on 1st and 3rd, Sasaki gets rung up on a pitch that was below his knees. When can we get ABS (automated ball-strike system)?
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - JJJ - 04-12-2025
Lost 11-10 and the ACC losing streak continues. :(
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 05:46 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 04:07 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
Disagree.
The starting three were suppose to be the strong point of this team. The Friday starter has been struggling, and the new Friday starter has no control.
Why should he stay??
Sources tell me that Eager was responsible for the development of Quinn Matthews and several others. I don't think he's the problem.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - Brickcity - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 07:19 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 05:46 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 04:07 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:23 PM)JJJ Wrote: Our opener, Speshyock, faced 4 hitters and gave up a bomb of a 3-run shot, and we’re going to the ‘pen. Hoping for better outcomes with O’Harran on the mound now.
I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
Disagree.
The starting three were suppose to be the strong point of this team. The Friday starter has been struggling, and the new Friday starter has no control.
Why should he stay??
Sources tell me that Eager was responsible for the development of Quinn Matthews and several others. I don't think he's the problem.
Not enough guys like Quinn Matthews and too many guys who repeatedly get shelled. He's the problem.
RE: Stanford Baseball 2025 - TonyLima - 04-12-2025
(04-12-2025, 10:05 PM)Brickcity Wrote:(04-12-2025, 07:19 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 05:46 PM)Baller4 Wrote:(04-12-2025, 04:07 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(04-12-2025, 03:25 PM)Baller4 Wrote: I am sorry, but Eager needs to go!!!!!
Disagree.
The starting three were suppose to be the strong point of this team. The Friday starter has been struggling, and the new Friday starter has no control.
Why should he stay??
Sources tell me that Eager was responsible for the development of Quinn Matthews and several others. I don't think he's the problem.
Not enough guys like Quinn Matthews and too many guys who repeatedly get shelled. He's the problem.
Or maybe — hear me out — the current pitchers are not at the Matthews standard.