David Shaw's rooting interest vis-a-via Clemson? - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: David Shaw's rooting interest vis-a-via Clemson? (/thread-10813.html)

---

Re: David Shaw's rooting interest vis-a-via Clemson? - winflop - 12-01-2015

There is no way the Committee will take 12-1 UNC over 11-2 Stanford.

UNC has not played a single team in the current CFP Top 25 and has a horrible loss to South Carolina.

I'm not counting on Florida vs Alabama unless some flu bug strikes half Crimson Tide starters, and even then...

---

Re: David Shaw's rooting interest vis-a-via Clemson? - fullmetal - 12-03-2015

Go Tar Heels!  I have no prior experience with that school...would take a CFP playoff spot over any rooting interest in the Carolinas.

---

Re: David Shaw's rooting interest vis-a-via Clemson? - larkinforever - 12-03-2015

(12-01-2015, 07:42 PM)Boston Card link Wrote:They are using FPI to predict odds of winning, and FPI has, for whatever reason, always loved Unbelievably Spoiled Children, so it's not surprising we are given a 48% chance of winning the conference championship.  Vegas has us as 4.5 point favorites, which has historically corresponded to a ~63% chance of victory.

I think, using FPI, SC was given something like an 86% chance of winning the September game against Stanford.

---