The CardBoard
MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN (/thread-17108.html)

Pages: 1 2 3

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - PVTree - 01-03-2019

A Madsen, a Vlahov, a Reveno...we need some toughness in the paint.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - BostonCard - 01-03-2019

(01-03-2019, 11:00 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Seems like San Antonio was about a century ago.

These guys need a tough guy. A Ravelli or a Kirchofer. They are soft.

Here's all you need to know.  Points in the paint: UCLA 56, Stanford 30

BC

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - JohnR34231 - 01-04-2019

(01-03-2019, 10:36 PM)Farm93 Wrote:  
(01-03-2019, 10:18 PM)winflop Wrote:  Last week was a nice game from Sharma and illustrates why I'm frustrated with him and have given up on him. Last week showed that has the talent to be a force but rarely can he stay on the floor for more than 15 mins a game because he's a foul magnet.

If UCLA was at the level of Villanova or Duke, I would be thrilled with the performance.   However, knowing that UCLA has a million issues right now, this feels like a bad effort.

FWIW - Walton needs to go.   The whole broadcast he goes on and on about all kinds of things that have nothing to do with the game, the programs, or college basketball.   Sure, if you watch him once the stories might seem charming, but over multiple exposures it becomes very annoying.

I heard Walton commentate quite some time ago and IIRC he loves to pontificate, and not always about basketball. I could see where it would get annoying.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - PVTree - 01-04-2019

I like Walton's ramblings. Yesterday, I preferred to hear them than what I was watching on the court. Also, he always has high praise for Stanford as a university.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - burger - 01-04-2019

(01-03-2019, 10:57 PM)2006alum Wrote:  This may be the game where my faith/patience in Haase begins to turn. Were there halftime adjustments? I didn't see any. Did we have any discernable strategy to handle them in the paint or keep them out of it? Not that I could tell. We made Ucla look like a top flight team by letting them walk all over us basically at will.
I agree ~60% with you, but there is still a part of me that thinks that maybe we're just asking too much of a team playing on the road, missing its star point guard, playing freshmen for a total of 87 minutes (44% of all of our minutes), and with Ryan in his first game back after injury.

On the plus side, I love Okpala more every game.  What a great all-around player he's become.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - winflop - 01-04-2019

(01-03-2019, 11:04 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  
(01-03-2019, 11:00 PM)Phogge Wrote:  Seems like San Antonio was about a century ago.

These guys need a tough guy. A Ravelli or a Kirchofer. They are soft.

Here's all you need to know.  Points in the paint: UCLA 56, Stanford 30

BC

This is what happens when the only inside player you have reverts to his old form and spends most of the game on the bench in foul trouble. It showed an easy formula for beating this team - pound the ball inside, get Sharma in foul trouble, and own the paint at both ends.

Last night was positively awful. This team is not good and does not look like a team that can even make the Not Important Tournament.
I am starting to question whether Haase is the answer here.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - Phogge - 01-04-2019

I would wait a bit before claiming that Davis is a “Star.”

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - BobK - 01-04-2019

This team has good athletes like they could be Track Stars. High Jumpers etc. sadly most aren’t good basketball players. They just can’t shoot. They don’t understand defense.

Three poor coaches in a row.

I know we can’t expect to be as good as Liberty.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - Phogge - 01-04-2019

Who would want the job.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - SamuelMcF - 01-04-2019

(01-04-2019, 10:36 AM)Phogge Wrote:  Who would want the job.
I’ll happily take 4 years of pac-12 basketball coach salary before being fired for having no idea what I’m doing. Maybe more if I get Muir to like me. Sign me up!

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - oldalum - 01-04-2019

(01-04-2019, 09:54 AM)BobK Wrote:  This team has good athletes like they could be Track Stars.   High Jumpers etc.  sadly most aren’t good basketball players.    They just can’t shoot.  They don’t understand defense.

Yes. But I'm not ready to give up on Haase yet, have to give him 2-3 years coaching his own recruits (he's had one so far). Remember Montgomery's start.

Speaking of Montgomery, I would love to see him hired as a man-to-man defense consultant. His teams had a consistent team approach to man-to-man, each year the new players would get schooled in how to do it and when they were ready they would get plugged in without drop-off.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - BobK - 01-04-2019

One and one half years thus far. Just sayin

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - Phogge - 01-04-2019

Uh Bobbbbbbbbbb, that would be two and a half seasons.

And Sam, The question concerned actual basketball coaches but nice try. Maybe the USF guy who is doing the mostus with the leastus.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - BobK - 01-04-2019

The poster said with Haase ‘s own recruits. That’s 1.5 my friend.

Gotcha lol

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - martyup - 01-04-2019

I watched the game on mute while also watching episodes of Dexter, season 4.  There must be irony in there, somehow.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - BostonCard - 01-04-2019

(01-04-2019, 09:54 AM)BobK Wrote:  This team has good athletes like they could be Track Stars.   High Jumpers etc.  sadly most aren’t good basketball players.    They just can’t shoot.  They don’t understand defense.  

Three poor coaches in a row.  

I know we can’t expect to be as good as Liberty.

And this is why the whining about Shaw and football after we go 9-4 gets tiresome.  I remember similar whining about Montgomery after early exits in the tournament.

Sometimes you don't know how good you have it until its gone and you go through a Teevens/Harris period (or a Johnson/Dawkins/Haase period).

That being said, I'm still hoping that we're rushing to judgment on Haase and he turns it around.

BC

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - oldalum - 01-04-2019

(01-04-2019, 11:50 AM)BobK Wrote:  One and one half years thus far.    Just sayin

yep. I would like to have seen at least one breakthrough game by now. But we're not at 2-3 years yet.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - d4cohn - 01-04-2019

(01-04-2019, 01:52 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  
(01-04-2019, 09:54 AM)BobK Wrote:  This team has good athletes like they could be Track Stars.   High Jumpers etc.  sadly most aren’t good basketball players.    They just can’t shoot.  They don’t understand defense.  

Three poor coaches in a row.  

I know we can’t expect to be as good as Liberty.

And this is why the whining about Shaw and football after we go 9-4 gets tiresome.  I remember similar whining about Montgomery after early exits in the tournament.

Sometimes you don't know how good you have it until its gone and you go through a Teevens/Harris period (or a Johnson/Dawkins/Haase period).

That being said, I'm still hoping that we're rushing to judgment on Haase and he turns it around.

BC

Another fantastic comment, per usual BC. For the record, TJ was fine for me compared to the level of performance post TJ (sure the program may have taken a step back under TJ, but making the tournament more consistently is at least a step above where we are now).

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - Phogge - 01-04-2019

OK Bobbbb, I’m ahead 99-1.

RE: MBB at UCLA, 8pm on ESPN - 2006alum - 01-04-2019

d4cohn, I don't think Johnson deserves much credit at all. His first year, he used Monty's personnel to get to the first round, then we lost. Then the following year we receded further and floundered in the NIT - our first failure to make the Tournament in 15 years. And I refuse to give Johnson credit for the Lopii, who were recruited and committed under Montgomery. The two years they were on campus, we made the tournament twice, losing in the first round their frosh year before reaching the Sweet Sixteen their sophomore year (where we were blown to bits by Texas). If you can't at least get a team with two top-15 lottery picks to at least the Sweet Sixteen, then you shouldn't be coaching at all. So basically, Johnson should get credit for bringing us Landry Fields - who all things considered should have been developed further while he was at Stanford than he did, given the underlying talent - and that's it. 

Sorry, but in my hierarchy of recent coaches, it's Monty > > > > > > Dawkins > > Johnson. Dawkins at least had the ability to recruit. Johnson was neither a good coach nor a good recruiter, and when he bounced, he left us with an exceptionally bare cupboard that took Dawkins 2-3 seasons to refill. Unfortunately, by the time Dawkins was finally axed, he did too, which is why we're all having to wait 3-4 seasons to see what Haase is capable of. 

And BC: Yes, yes, yes. That Shaw has largely been able to maintain Harbaugh's turnaround is itself an extraordinary accomplishment. I think folks around here have real short memories about how quickly programs can go south after a coaching change. Shaw consolidated our gains and made them sustainable in a way that I think, quite frankly, Harbaugh would never have been able to do, and he's done it now for 8 seasons. He deserves far more praise than he receives around these parts.