Name for the defense - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Name for the defense (/thread-18584.html)

---

RE: Name for the defense - Austroturf - 11-24-2019

(11-24-2019, 09:07 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote:  

(11-24-2019, 09:04 AM)Austroturf Wrote:  

(11-24-2019, 08:52 AM)martyup Wrote:  

(11-24-2019, 06:42 AM)JohnR34231 Wrote:  Yeah, it's been a crappy year, and I have a feeling it is going to get crappier next weekend.
So if you enjoy threads like this, stay tuned.

Actually,  it would be in Stanford football's schizophrenic DNA to shock the world and beat the Irish.

Yes, the genetic proclivity would be there, but I believe we will need a bit of self-destructive help from the Irish next Saturday to end up with the W.  How about Book throwing four interceptions?

Right, instead of 4 TD's.

I would take that trade....

---

RE: Name for the defense - winflop - 11-24-2019

hardly in the backfield

---

RE: Name for the defense - Phogge - 11-24-2019

He could toss four int’s and still win.

---

RE: Name for the defense - Goose - 11-24-2019

(11-24-2019, 12:17 PM)winflop Wrote:  hardly in the backfield

Winflop, I think Partly in the backfield was more like it. We often had three guys in the backfield on one side of the field (lift or right) as Garbers departed from the pocket via the other side, where there was nobody. Or maybe it was Party in the backfield but Garbers declined to attend?

---