Stanford vs USC Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs USC Game Thread (/thread-23438.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford vs USC Game Thread (/thread-23438.html)
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - old spanish trail - 09-10-2022
Agree Cohn. Go for it. Didn't work.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-10-2022
Looking for that Austin Jones fumble here...
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - winflop - 09-10-2022
I knew our defense wasn’t going to be good, but I didn’t think they’d be this bad. That is 100% on Shaw who should have cleaned house on that side of the ball last year
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-10-2022
Two INTs converted to 2 TDs by Troyens
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - lex24 - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:17 PM)ADPinWDC Wrote: Two INTs converted to 2 TDs by Troyens
That drive was like sh-t through a goose. Easy as they come.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - old spanish trail - 09-10-2022
SC will score 7 out of 8 times unless they fumble or commit dump penalty. SC will adjust to our new offense at half time. Still, at least we can move the ball...so far.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - lex24 - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:16 PM)winflop Wrote: I knew our defense wasn’t going to be good, but I didn’t think they’d be this bad. That is 100% on Shaw who should have cleaned house on that side of the ball last year
It’s fine to put it in Shaw. But do it for the failure to recruit on the defensive side of the ball. You can’t coach around small, unphysical and slow. It’s impossible.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - cardcrimson - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:04 PM)martyup Wrote: The toe touched in-bounds before the heel came down. Come on refs, that's a TD!In the lead up to the game, the Pitt/Tennessee game was on, and a very similar play occurred. They overrule the call on the field cause the heel hit out of bounds in one continuous motion.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - Brickcity - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:20 PM)lex24 Wrote:(09-10-2022, 05:16 PM)winflop Wrote: I knew our defense wasn’t going to be good, but I didn’t think they’d be this bad. That is 100% on Shaw who should have cleaned house on that side of the ball last year
It’s fine to put it in Shaw. But do it for the failure to recruit on the defensive side of the ball. You can’t coach around small, unphysical and slow. It’s impossible.
Why Diron Reynolds still has a job is one of the world's greatest mysteries. Of course, Anderson should probably been replaced years ago too.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - Phogge - 09-10-2022
Riley got away with it so why not try it yourself?
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - martyup - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:19 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: SC will score 7 out of 8 times unless they fumble or commit dump penalty. SC will adjust to our new offense at half time. Still, at least we can move the ball...so far.
We might score on every possession from here on in this game.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - lex24 - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:25 PM)martyup Wrote:(09-10-2022, 05:19 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: SC will score 7 out of 8 times unless they fumble or commit dump penalty. SC will adjust to our new offense at half time. Still, at least we can move the ball...so far.
We might score on every possession from here on in this game.
Was he inbounds?
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - murky - 09-10-2022
I was afraid Tanner didn't see Smith. He was wide open.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - ADPinWDC - 09-10-2022
Did EJ Smith have TWO feet in bounds on that one, refs?
How about a review, hmmm? 7 plays 93 yards, BOOM. 7 to 14
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - martyup - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:26 PM)lex24 Wrote:(09-10-2022, 05:25 PM)martyup Wrote:(09-10-2022, 05:19 PM)old spanish trail Wrote: SC will score 7 out of 8 times unless they fumble or commit dump penalty. SC will adjust to our new offense at half time. Still, at least we can move the ball...so far.
We might score on every possession from here on in this game.
Was he inbounds?
They should review it.
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - CompSci87 - 09-10-2022
All right now!
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - winflop - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:20 PM)lex24 Wrote:(09-10-2022, 05:16 PM)winflop Wrote: I knew our defense wasn’t going to be good, but I didn’t think they’d be this bad. That is 100% on Shaw who should have cleaned house on that side of the ball last year
It’s fine to put it in Shaw. But do it for the failure to recruit on the defensive side of the ball. You can’t coach around small, unphysical and slow. It’s impossible.
100%. Coaches are responsible for the years of poor recruiting and everything else that has led to what we are seeing today
At least the running game is working for us
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - murky - 09-10-2022
Who predicted we'd have 120 yards rushing in the 1st quarter?
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - martyup - 09-10-2022
(09-10-2022, 05:27 PM)murky Wrote: Who predicted we'd have 120 yards rushing in the 1st quarter?
![[Image: ?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhandsontable.com%2Fblog...f=1&nofb=1]](https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fhandsontable.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2018%2F09%2Fthats-me.gif&f=1&nofb=1)
RE: Stanford vs USC Game Thread - CompSci87 - 09-10-2022
Great throw by the USC QB.