WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 (/thread-23700.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 (/thread-23700.html)
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - mbdude - 11-11-2022
Stanford 25 to 17 rebounds. Pacific has 2 more offensive rebounds but they are missing a lot more shots
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - martyup - 11-11-2022
Jones with 4 turnovers in the first half. 9 for the team.
Pretty sloppy. UOP has 8 offensive boards to our 6. Overall, UOP has 17 rebounds to our 25.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - 81alum - 11-11-2022
The second quarter went much better than the first, 28-8. Iriafen still has not missed, 5-5. Jones is 0-3 from three point range. When the threes don't go in--and they did not in the 1st quarter--everything else seems harder. But 25% of our threes....we will need better than that against South Carolina.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - martyup - 11-11-2022
It's hard to see what's going on with this crappy livestream. It seems like we are getting out hustled in general. We settled down in the 2nd Q and started playing better, but still a little frantic.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - mbdude - 11-11-2022
Frantic a good description
2nd qtr 13 - 2 edge in rebounds. 0 off rbs for pacific
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-11-2022
(11-11-2022, 07:53 PM)81alum Wrote: The second quarter went much better than the first, 28-8. Iriafen still has not missed, 5-5. Jones is 0-3 from three point range. When the threes don't go in--and they did not in the 1st quarter--everything else seems harder. But 18% of our threes....yikes. We will need better than that against South Carolina.
Maybe it's the bad sightlines.
BC
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - triangle2 - 11-11-2022
Never going to complain again about the Stanford livestream or announcers.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - 81alum - 11-11-2022
We have held James to 1/11, midway through the 3rd quarter. Iriafen up to 7/7.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - CompSci87 - 11-11-2022
(11-11-2022, 08:02 PM)BostonCard Wrote:(11-11-2022, 07:53 PM)81alum Wrote: The second quarter went much better than the first, 28-8. Iriafen still has not missed, 5-5. Jones is 0-3 from three point range. When the threes don't go in--and they did not in the 1st quarter--everything else seems harder. But 18% of our threes....yikes. We will need better than that against South Carolina.
Maybe it's the bad sightlines.
BC
Maybe the wrong players shooting them. Not convinced Haley has gotten a lot better. Cam had some of our misses too.
Hannah is 4-4 now.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - martyup - 11-11-2022
We scored 33 in the 3rd Q. That will work anytime. Prechtel on fire. Jump on fire.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - 81alum - 11-11-2022
Well, our offense took off in the 3rd quarter but our defensive intensity softened. A 33-18 quarter.
Three point shooting heated up for us. Now up to 9/19 thanks in large part to Prechtel's 3/4 and Jump's 4/4.
A 40 point lead.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - martyup - 11-11-2022
Brink is back to her fouling ways. Has only played 13 minutes in 3 quarters. With only 4:34 to play, Brink has 3 fouls and no other Stanford player has more than 1.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-11-2022
Is it too early to proclaim Iriafen the next great Stanford star?
15 points on 7/7 shooting from the field. For the season, she is shooting a ridiculous 17/24 and leads all Stanford players with 41 points over 3 games.
BC
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - martyup - 11-11-2022
(11-11-2022, 08:44 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Is it too early to proclaim Iriafen the next great Stanford star?
15 points on 7/7 shooting from the field. For the season, she is shooting a ridiculous 17/24 and leads all Stanford players with 41 points over 3 games.
BC
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/W2cuCm4EygmdtO7uUC/giphy.gif)
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - here4WBB - 11-11-2022
(11-11-2022, 08:12 PM)triangle2 Wrote: Never going to complain again about the Stanford livestream or announcers.
the announcer!!! "Fire in the hole!" "Panic at the Disco!"
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - qwerty49 - 11-11-2022
One nit to pick but I think it's curable. If I'm scouting Stanford, and if my team is playing help D, I would point out that EVERY time Betts gets ready to shoot she puts the ball on the floor. Even when she's three feet away on the low block. Need some strong coaching on Stanford's part to take that tell away. She can get away with that against creampuff opponents but top-level defenders will gladly take the extra half-second to get into position.
RE: WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 - martyup - 11-11-2022
Kiki with 15 points in 15 minutes. Ashten with 11 points in 11 minutes. Betts leading all rebounders in only 12 minutes of play.
RE: WBB: Stanford vs Pacific Game Thread - 81alum - 11-11-2022
(11-11-2022, 08:49 PM)qwerty49 Wrote: One nit to pick but I think it's curable. If I'm scouting Stanford, and if my team is playing help D, I would point out that EVERY time Betts gets ready to shoot she puts the ball on the floor. Even when she's three feet away on the low block. Need some strong coaching on Stanford's part to take that tell away. She can get away with that against creampuff opponents but top-level defenders will gladly take the extra half-second to get into position.Last game I think an announcer remarked how well coached she was since she caught the ball high and never went to the floor. She must have regressed a little tonight.
Iriafen is indeed the next star. As a freshman she was already showing the moves and confidence down low that it took years for McCall, Dodson, or Fingall to develop, and this year she has added an accurate jumper and superb defense. She deserves to be a starter. And she will need that jumper against South Carolina.
Games balls to Prechtel and Jump for jolting our three point shooting out of a slump. And how they did!
Best stat: James was held to 2/14.
Worst stats: We gave UOP 14 O-boards. That is a dangerous habit given who is coming up next week. 16 turnovers also was too sloppy for this level of competition.
RE: WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 - BostonCard - 11-11-2022
Alas, we did not break 100. Once again, a laugher over an overmatched opponent. Our bench beat Pacific 50-44.
13 players scored; 8 scored 7 or more points and three (Iriafen, Jump, and Prechtel) were in double digits. Twelve players got double digit minutes.
Sharpshooters of the game were Jump (4/4 from three), Prechtel (3/4 from three). As a team, we shot 43% from 3, 59% overall, and 71% from the free throw line.
3 players (Betts with 10, Iriafen with 8, and Jones with 7) had at least 7 rebounds. Brink and Betts each had three brinks. Although Pacific nabbed more offensive rebounds than we did, it was just based on the fact that we just didn't leave many rebounds to be grabbed on our offensive end. Pacific left 56 missed shots (and free throws) to be rebounded, and we got 40 of them (71% of available defensive rebounds). On our end, we only left 30 shots to be rebounded, and nabbed 11 (37%, so Pacific grabbed 63% of the available defensive rebounds). Given our size, it could have been better, but hardly the concern some people made it during the game.
Lepolo led the team in assists, but she had an equal number of turnovers. Sloppy day all around, with 16 turnovers, one more than Pacific. Probably the one thing Tara will be pissed about.
BC
RE: WBB: Stanford 98 -- Pacific 44 - chimera - 11-11-2022
That stream was poor, as was some of the officiating. We were sloppy early yet still almost hit 100. I understand why some teams use the score board feed and show replays but my goodness, it is insanely annoying when I see one of our players wind up for a long pass and it cuts to a stupid replay of a common shot. Even fans of the home team want to see the live action, not a replay of every basket.
Anyway, early season and can't all be great games. We are not that happy with a 50+ point win, that tells us something. Rebounding was not great and too many turnovers. Too many fouls too, although some were phantom.