RE: Stanford Football moving on -
Hurlburt88 - 11-27-2022
what about an NFL coordinator? I think about someone like Mike Kafka who also understands academically-oriented institutions.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
BostonCard - 11-27-2022
I liked Matt Squeri’s list better, though a couple of names overlapped. The Athletic list is heavy on coaches with a Stanford connection (Bloomgren, Mason, Walters, Roman), which has some advantages but I think is also too limiting.
BC
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
CowboyIndian - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 08:19 AM)washingtonismoney Wrote: He's maybe not the most inspiring pick from a W-L perspective, but I've always been intrigued by Matt Campbell.
62-14
P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
MarinCard - 11-27-2022
That's right. Bring Scott Frost home. [/sarcasm]
(For those who don't remember:
https://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/article/Once-a-Stanford-QB-Frost-helps-Oregon-fly-now-4958481.php)
RE: P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
Phogge - 11-27-2022
John Gruden is available... choke, caugh, Ralph.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
81alum - 11-27-2022
No one will accept the job without knowing more precisely what Stanford is willing to do on NIL and transfers. My guess is that is why Shaw was discussing it with administration last week. So we should know a lot more about what the administration is willing to do not only when the new hire is announced, but when the new policies that come with him are announced.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
Phogge - 11-27-2022
Deion would be spectacular. Does he have a degree?
Brennan and Taylor understand the area but have little or no experience recruiting nationally. They could bring in a consultant, someone like a modern George Rush who knew just about every high school coach in the country.
RE: Stanford Football moving on - Softball Fan - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
Excellent choice. Undoubtedly paid big bucks.
Football IMO needs a type A personality who is willing to spend all hours of day and night recruiting. Need to get back up and running ASAP which will take elite players.
Also need someone who understands Stanford admissions and exactly what is needed to get accepted. This is something Harbaugh didn't know his first year and a bunch of his recruits were rejected by admissions.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
winflop - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 10:42 AM)paloalto Wrote: (11-27-2022, 08:18 AM)BobK Wrote: Actually Muir and Dept are in a roll in hiring head coaches
Baseball
Softball
Men’s tennis
Men’s swimming
Women’s Volleyball
Track $ Field XC
Men’s water polo, Lacrosse and Field Hockey look good but early
Excellent choice. Undoubtedly paid big bucks.
Football IMO needs a type A personality who is willing to spend all hours of day and night recruiting. Need to get back up and running ASAP which will take elite players.
Recruiting is among the least of the program's problems. Player development, scheme/play calling, and S&C are bigger deficiencies. New HC needs to clean house
RE: Stanford Football moving on - Softball Fan - 11-27-2022
Yes, program needs many things. New coach must be a multi-tasker.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
Mick - 11-27-2022
I would take whichever one of these three are the best recruiter...
Jesse Minter - Matthew and Nicole Lester Family Football Defensive Coordinator - Staff Directory - University of Michigan Athletics (mgoblue.com)
Matt Weiss - Sanford Robertson Co-Offensive Coordinator/ Robert McCollum Family Quarterbacks - Staff Directory - University of Michigan Athletics (mgoblue.com)
Steve Clinkscale - Co-Defensive Coordinator/Defensive Passing Game Coordinator/Defensive Backs - Staff Directory - University of Michigan Athletics (mgoblue.com)
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
martyup - 11-27-2022
We need a kick ass strength and conditioning program. Too many injuries.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
BostonCard - 11-27-2022
Agree, Hambly has shown himself to be a great coach. Like Shaw, he inherited a ton, and delivered championships with them. Then, when that team was disassembled, he has rebuilt the current team from scratch, and should be a title contender next year.
BC
RE: P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
Mick - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 10:23 AM)MarinCard Wrote: That's right. Bring Scott Frost home. [/sarcasm]
(For those who don't remember: https://www.sfgate.com/collegesports/article/Once-a-Stanford-QB-Frost-helps-Oregon-fly-now-4958481.php)
If Justin Wilcox goes elsewhere, I would strongly recommend Coach Frost as his replacement...
RE: P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
winflop - 11-27-2022
I don't want a coach with any Stanford connections. We desperately need fresh ideas from outside the bubble
RE: P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
Mick - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 11:12 AM)winflop Wrote: I don't want a coach with any Stanford connections. We desperately need fresh ideas from outside the bubble
How about Vandy connections?
Jesse Minter - Matthew and Nicole Lester Family Football Defensive Coordinator - Staff Directory - University of Michigan Athletics (mgoblue.com)
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
jonnyss - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 10:37 AM)Phogge Wrote: Deion would be spectacular. Does he have a degree?
yes, originally florida state, then went back and completed his degree at talladega in 2020.
sports illustrated recommendations
RE: P5 coach on the market with Stanford connections -
martyup - 11-27-2022
We need a program that can get our guys in better shape to avoid so many injuries.
You are going to get sick of me making this point because I will be persistent.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
OutsiderFan - 11-27-2022
I don't know if I've ever seen a more opposite to what Stanford is all about suggestion for a Head Coach than Deion Sanders.
And just the suggestion of such a name suggests Stanford would be "big game hunting" for a Head Football coach. I just don't see the congruity with Stanford and how it is perceived, and having a football program that would be paying top dollar for a proven Head Football Coach.
Before a hire is made, Stanford had to decide what it wants from its football program. Does it want to be a playoff contender? Does it want football to be a revenue generator? Does Stanford want its football program to raise the profile of the university to Joe Public? Does Stanford want to fill the Stanford Stadium with paying customers? Now that Shaw has been seemingly forced out (I know we can debate the nuances of this, but let's be honest, if Stanford was 8-4 this year Shaw would not have coached his last game for Stanford on November 26, 2022), and does seem ready to embrace the transfer portal, we can assume Stanford does in fact care to some degree about having a legit football program.
Many people on this board have suggested Stanford might drop football, but I think the Shaw move and the transfer portal embrace shows Stanford is willing to be dragged - after some kicking and screaming - into a much more professionalized college sports reality. This would suggest Stanford is ready to make the investments needed to win, sell tickets, and generate ratings. Maybe there actually is an imperative to be attractive to a Big Ten invite? Now it's just a matter of identifying who that person is that can make it happen.
RE: Stanford Football moving on -
chrisk - 11-27-2022
(11-27-2022, 11:34 AM)OutsiderFan Wrote: I don't know if I've ever seen a more opposite to what Stanford is all about suggestion for a Head Coach than Deion Sanders.
And just the suggestion of such a name suggests Stanford would be "big game hunting" for a Head Football coach. I just don't see the congruity with Stanford and how it is perceived, and having a football program that would be paying top dollar for a proven Head Football Coach.
Before a hire is made, Stanford had to decide what it wants from its football program. Does it want to be a playoff contender? Does it want football to be a revenue generator? Does Stanford want its football program to raise the profile of the university to Joe Public? Does Stanford want to fill the Stanford Stadium with paying customers? Now that Shaw has been seemingly forced out (I know we can debate the nuances of this, but let's be honest, if Stanford was 8-4 this year Shaw would not have coached his last game for Stanford on November 26, 2022), and does seem ready to embrace the transfer portal, we can assume Stanford does in fact care to some degree about having a legit football program.
Many people on this board have suggested Stanford might drop football, but I think the Shaw move and the transfer portal embrace shows Stanford is willing to be dragged - after some kicking and screaming - into a much more professionalized college sports reality. This would suggest Stanford is ready to make the investments needed to win, sell tickets, and generate ratings. Maybe there actually is an imperative to be attractive to a Big Ten invite? Now it's just a matter of identifying who that person is that can make it happen.
Where does this focus on a Big 10 invite come from. It is not happening anytime soon and would remove a positive differentiator for Stanford. 5 of the top 16 ranked teams are currently in the PAC-12 and 4 of them will be in the new PAC-10.