RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
Austroturf - 12-13-2022
(12-13-2022, 03:46 AM)Langdude Wrote: (12-13-2022, 01:06 AM)yvonne Wrote: (12-13-2022, 12:06 AM)chrisk Wrote: In the channel 2 story on the press conference tonight, the sports anchor called the AD "John Muir."
It's true. His closing pitch to Taylor was:
"The foothills are calling and you must go."
I'd be totally cool with Muir going to Yosemite and, like, staying there.
-m.
Or taking the AD job at Muir Woods.
RE: Sunday morning thoughts - Troy Taylor! -
French Rage - 12-13-2022
(12-13-2022, 03:02 AM)Austroturf Wrote: (12-12-2022, 09:06 PM)French Rage Wrote: (12-12-2022, 01:39 PM)Austroturf Wrote: I thought his statements about doing everything with "love" were a bit over-the-top.
Yeah I mean that guy graduated like 4 years ago, probably not a good idea to base the offense around him.
And I don't think he has any eligibility left!
(12-12-2022, 10:43 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: (12-12-2022, 09:06 PM)French Rage Wrote: (12-12-2022, 01:39 PM)Austroturf Wrote: I thought his statements about doing everything with "love" were a bit over-the-top.
Yeah I mean that guy graduated like 4 years ago, probably not a good idea to base the offense around him.
funny.
At least he didn't say that he wanted to do everything with "luck"!
He said he wants his players To-be good Christians with a little bit of Love and Luck.
RE: Sunday morning thoughts - Troy Taylor! -
cardcrimson - 12-13-2022
(12-13-2022, 01:28 PM)French Rage Wrote: (12-13-2022, 03:02 AM)Austroturf Wrote: (12-12-2022, 09:06 PM)French Rage Wrote: (12-12-2022, 01:39 PM)Austroturf Wrote: I thought his statements about doing everything with "love" were a bit over-the-top.
Yeah I mean that guy graduated like 4 years ago, probably not a good idea to base the offense around him.
And I don't think he has any eligibility left!
(12-12-2022, 10:43 PM)cardcrimson Wrote: (12-12-2022, 09:06 PM)French Rage Wrote: (12-12-2022, 01:39 PM)Austroturf Wrote: I thought his statements about doing everything with "love" were a bit over-the-top.
Yeah I mean that guy graduated like 4 years ago, probably not a good idea to base the offense around him.
funny.
At least he didn't say that he wanted to do everything with "luck"!
He said he wants his players To-be good Christians with a little bit of Love and Luck.
Very nice!
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
jonnyss - 12-13-2022
i watched the video - thanks for posting! i like him.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
Goose - 12-13-2022
(12-13-2022, 09:41 AM)Austroturf Wrote: (12-13-2022, 03:46 AM)Langdude Wrote: (12-13-2022, 01:06 AM)yvonne Wrote: (12-13-2022, 12:06 AM)chrisk Wrote: In the channel 2 story on the press conference tonight, the sports anchor called the AD "John Muir."
It's true. His closing pitch to Taylor was:
"The foothills are calling and you must go."
I'd be totally cool with Muir going to Yosemite and, like, staying there.
-m.
Or taking the AD job at Muir Woods.
That would be great! After a few years of his leadership we can probably get parking places without a reservation.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
KartyFan - 12-13-2022
I also enjoyed the press conference, seems like a great guy and possibly a great fit for us.
Surprised nobody has brought up two statements TT made that I took as a commitment that he is a Stanford lifer. Here is the second:
"This use my final destination, the final chapter in my coaching life, and hopefully it will be for a very long time."
All coaches say they want to be at their current job for a long time, but this seems like a very bold statement. Thoughts?
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
StanfordMatt - 12-13-2022
(12-13-2022, 08:47 PM)KartyFan Wrote: I also enjoyed the press conference, seems like a great guy and possibly a great fit for us.
Surprised nobody has brought up two statements TT made that I took as a commitment that he is a Stanford lifer. Here is the second:
"This use my final destination, the final chapter in my coaching life, and hopefully it will be for a very long time."
All coaches say they want to be at their current job for a long time, but this seems like a very bold statement. Thoughts?
Taylor is 54. Even in a best case scenario for him, he's in his late 50's by the time he turns the ship around and is in a position to be an attractive candidate to other schools. The trend these days is for top programs to hire HC's in their 30's, not ones approaching 60.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
Reactions:
- * I'm still processing how I feel about Muir following this hire. I've never felt highly of him and the public-facing aspects of this search reinforce my sense he's not an impressive leader. I also don't think the process for the hire seemed optimal - too much self-selection, too much narrowing of the pool based on perceived interest/attributes/background yet simultaneously involving a committee approach on a massive number of candidates rather than narrowing down based on football-centric criteria, the weird Garrett episode. But I like to judge leaders based on results and Taylor strikes me as a fine hire. This is one of the biggest decisions Muir will ever make in his career and if he got it right that's got to count for something. Feeling a lot less intense about BMMG than I was three weeks ago. Muir has big things to navigate ahead - future conference alignment, institutional support to the major programs in the NIL and transfer portal environment, and firing and replacing Haase. I'm still open to Muir winning me over even though I've never been impressed by him.
- * Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose! I think we knocked this hire out of the park. I'm convinced there were two or three run dingers potentially there for the taking that we didn't take swings on (the process concern above), but I'm very happy with Taylor. He's got a stellar track record as a head football coach, albeit at two much lower levels, and exudes the perspective and attention to culture that we need. Throughout this press conference I found myself relieved and sometimes giddy that we have a coach who combines enthusiasm, competitiveness, love of players and staff, and competence. He hit all the right notes. The important work lies ahead, but the press conference raises confidence we got this right. [Again, nobody can know for certain whether a hire will be good]
- * Classy to thank Shaw and I don't think Taylor overdid it. It actually was more interesting to me that Muir did not thank Shaw and picked Walsh and Harbaugh, rather than Shaw, as the examples of great Stanford coaches without Power Five head coaching experience. By the way, notable that Muir proactively advanced an argument about Stanford's ability to find great coaches for football and other sports at without Power Five head coaching experience by looking for "tools and mindset." He is undoubtedly hyper-aware that reaching all the way down to FCS is the primary question and criticism of this hire. Muir's nod to it didn't rub me the wrong way per se but did sound a bit more defensive and self-justifying than confident. It actually somewhat raised in my mind the likelihood that this hire was done on a budget and without ambition. I wish Stanford were the type of program that could poach big-time Power Five coaches but I guess we aren't. Muir kind of reinforced that by drawing attention to Taylor's lower level experience. I suppose it's a big enough critique Muir couldn't ignore it.
- * The multiple references to "final destination" weren't accidental. That's not something you have to say. Frankly, if he were to succeed at Stanford such that he parlayed it into a better job, I'd be fine with that. It's the Stanford way historically. And I generally don't want people who are done reaching higher. [Importantly, he had numerous comments later indicative of ambition and an ethic of continuous improvement, so I am not raising alarms that "final destination" guarantees he'll grow stale. I just generally would rather have somebody who wants to reach greater heights than somebody who's found their bliss.] Taylor didn't have to say "final destination" or "there's no other place I'd rather be than right here." That was a conscious choice he made. My theory is he did so for at least one of two reasons. First, he knows he's a Cal legend and highly-associated with the Golden Bears, so he's trying to preempt doubts about his staying power at Stanford. Second, Cal is deeply foundational to his career and self-image and coming to the Farm is something he's had to wrestle with, which I hypothesize has led to a story of self in which Stanford is the perfect and ultimate fit for him. In other words, I think his process of seeking and securing the Stanford job involved a personal journey in which he came to a place of emotional acceptance that he's not going to be the Cal head coach. It's easier to get to that place if you convince yourself Stanford is the single best place for you. Listening to this press conference I feel like Taylor genuinely got himself to that place.
- * His ode to why Stanford's special hit the right notes and provides confidence he can sell the value proposition to recruits. That's not a big deal as it's not rocket science, but nonetheless notable. Walt Harris lacked the elevator pitch - or even understanding of and connection to the university - that Taylor has already demonstrated. Taylor can talk the talk and that's worth something. I do hope that he can understand the difference between public relations and football-specific maneuvering when it comes to roster management. The last coach was a Stanford Man obsessive and I'd rather not repeat that. If Taylor talks up how special the players are to help him with certain recruiting pitches, maintain good relations with administrators and faculty, and project a good public image, great. If he starts getting so focused on the marketing campaign that he takes his eyes off bringing in the best football players he can, he could fall into a trap.
- * Some will find "we build this program with love" and "we lead with love" and the repeated, earnest meditations on love being a more powerful force than fear to be corny. Not me. This is what culture looks like. An authentic, intentional leader with a vision for how something strong and durable can be built. I'm not so jaded as to think there's any organization or team that's impervious to the power of love, but I certainly don't think college students are too old for this message. Dabo Swinney, Matt Campbell, and many other successful coaches sound just like Taylor and boil down their programs to "love." This isn't corny or naive. It's real. These players aren't that much older than high school players. Those who try to overly professionalize college football miss some of the magic of college football. Those who try to glean all kinds of lessons from pro football while turning their noses up at high school football may be catering to their own vanity rather than truly optimizing for success at the college level. Personally I felt Shaw was often guilty of this. He made football workmanlike, antiseptic, calculating, and transactional. Much was lost taking joy, aggression, spontaneity, and passion out of the game.
- * Inevitably any hire of somebody replacing a predecessor who failed will involve a pendulum shift away from the traits of the predecessor. To my mind one of the most fundamental corrections Stanford football has made with this hire is to now err on the side of those things Shaw lacked, or even undermined. In a sense one of the most important ways to understand the transition may be to think of it as going from an NFL coach to a high school coach. That's not quite the right frame as Shaw was only cosplaying what he thought an NFL coach was and Taylor has demonstrated sublime dominance as a college football coach, but in terms of philosophy and approach you could do worse than to think of this as capturing some of the insights of high school football we lost sight of in pursuing a "pro-style" program.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
- * The thing I love about "love of Stanford, a love of each other, a love of our coaches, a love of competition, a love of football" is it encapsulates the culture I perceive as missing from Stanford in recent years. I believe we've entered into a downward spiral in large part because football ceased being fun and joyful and that led to losses, which led to it being even less fun and joyful, and all of that interacted with things in Shaw's personality as well as secular trends across the university and sport that frayed the bonds of brothership between the players. The result was a toxic culture - a culture of losing and leaving. The things Taylor is focused on instilling and fostering love for address that. Players who love Stanford, each other, and their coaches will be more likely to stay and actually build something. Players who love competition and football will do the hard things necessary to get better. It obviously remains to be seen how well Taylor can translate his rhetoric into results, but the rhetoric is exactly what I want to hear, and what he did at Sacramento State shows he's done it before.
- * When he talked about the kind of players we'll be going after, he said it will be players who "love football, love each other, and love Stanford." Yes, in that order please! Real evidence he gets it in terms of the players we need to succeed.
- * Taylor doesn't strike me as a Harbaugh-like sloganeer, but "fervor, excitement, and love that's never been seen before" does seem like a very intentional turn of phrase. Actually, he has quite a few phrases (many of which I quote or paraphrase in this post) distilling his philosophy, so maybe it only doesn't come across as sloganeering because he intersperses them so naturally. By the way, "fervent" and "fervor" were two of the primary words in the word cloud for this press conference, from both Muir and Taylor. I don't think that's an accident either - fervor is probably the word Taylor used to sell himself and that stuck with the search committee.
- * Inviting every player on the roster back was an extremely interesting piece of news. On one level, this seems at odds with a desire to instill a new culture. Surely there are steak eaters who don't help the team. However, I see Taylor extending this invitation as a nod to pragmatism on two levels. First, the mass hemorrhaging telegraphed before Shaw stepped down (reinforced by immediate transfer portal entries) creates a massive roster management issue. Taylor steps into a position at significant risk of not coming close to a full, rational allocation of allowed scholarships and potentially numerous gaping holes on the depth chart. Given Stanford's posture these are holes that can only be plugged by incoming transfers to a modest extent, if that. Ultimately there's a major stanching the bleeding aspect to Taylor inviting everybody back. He referred to this as "calming the waters" in light of understandable anxiety at a time of turmoil after so much stability. Second, it's easier to preach love and camaraderie through inclusivity than exclusivity. If Taylor started picking winners and losers on the roster, that undercuts any message of love irrespective of football quality/health status/etc., and also runs the risk of pitting individuals against each other or at least fostering resentments. Taylor has opted for "we're all in this boat together." As much as I want him to purge the program of Shaw's influence as quickly as possible, including by turning over the roster, this is probably prudent. He's going to have to coach this team in 2023 and inviting everybody back arguably helps immediate competitive prospects and lends credibility to the overall message he's selling.
- * Taylor articulately and deftly handled the NIL and transfer landscape issue but I still don't feel like I have any better sense of what Stanford will actually do and the support Taylor will get from the administration. This will be interesting to watch.
- " We will be champions here, I don't know when it will happen but we will be champions" was a great note to finish his opening statement. Confident but realistic. He has a job ahead of him. He believes in his philosophy and approach but he knows that it may take years, some unknown number of years. I like leaders with vision, confidence, and humility. Not the easiest mix to get right and obviously these are only words, but again the right notes.
- * Others have noted this but it was noticeable how many Sacramento reporters asked questions. An observer could be forgiven for not knowing which program plays major college football based on the level of interest from local media. I hope Sacramento State has more good football years ahead, but I hope even more we can get past all the indignities of the irrelevance Shaw sunk us into. People should care about a Power Five program. [In fairness, there was a decent variety of media outlets at this press conference and they asked solid questions] Because he's a Sacramento legend, I also wonder if Sacramento media will now start taking a much larger interest in Stanford. Some of the hometown reporters were asking Stanford-specific questions.
- * Notable that Taylor's indication of Muir/Stanford integrity was the willingness to let Taylor finish out the playoffs at Sacramento State. We'll never know what that would have looked like had the Hornets kept winning, and it could have been dicey for getting our rebuild off on the right foot. But I do appreciate the point about integrity.
- * He said all the right things about the number one priority being taking care of the student-athletes and providing them the support they need but this gets back to my point on public relations vs. the nitty gritty exigencies of football. Taylor can't lose sight of getting players to graduate and academic support and such, but the reality is that's not what will be hard about his job or what we really need him for. Shaw leaned in to a lot of Stanford Man stuff that either takes care of itself or can be overseen by others. We need from Taylor a focus on football. Again, he might be saying these things just because they're the right PR things to say. It also occurs to me that he just went through a whole interview process in which he had to sell Stanford powers-that-be, and that means articulately and passionately delivering all of these company lines, so rhetoric in this press conference could be significantly shaped by the mental modules he's downloaded in recent weeks.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
*If we're being honest about that, he explicitly telegraphed in this press conference that he'll have an over-riding focus on soft Stanford goals (graduation, providing a good college experience) rather than the big-time college football aspects of his job. That's what I'm hoping is PR and an artifact of the head space he had to get into to get the job. Somewhat assuaging my concern is that when he spoke about providing a good college experience he brought that point home by saying winning is a big part of what makes a college football player's experience good. YES! For all the Stanford mission boilerplate, the other essential part of the coach we just hired came through time and again in this interview when he talked about his "point of departure": making sure the players know you care about them and love them, giving them the tools they need and the belief in you that you can lead them and make them better, and then sprinkle in some competency and creativity. Numerous aspects of this formula broke down in recent years for Stanford and I think Taylor gets it, so I am going to focus on that until he gives us reason to believe it's empty.
* Previous profiles on Taylor and his road less traveled (e.g., winding/unorthodox career path, proclivity to take jobs for reasons that have nothing to do with money or prestige, etc.) give a better glimpse into the man than I can do here, but it's interesting to hear from the horses mouth his self-conception of what drives him. He pushed back on the idea he had a path in mind from Folsom High to Power Five, noting the unorthodox path and saying he's driven by working with student-athletes, coaching football, and competing. Some of this may be self mythology. It's hard to distinguish between seeking head coaching jobs because they're moves up the ladder and seeking them for the competitive challenge. The way he lit up talking about the opportunity Beau Baldwin provided at Eastern Washington to be an offensive coordinator drove home for me how much Taylor relished the opportunity to prove himself on a bigger stage than Folsom. I don't think he's motivated by money, but I do think he's motivated by pride and striving, and I like that.
* I'm sure the vast majority of Stanford fans will view Taylor's offensive philosophy as music to the ears - being dynamic, finding space, creating space, and different ways of doing it. "We're not fear-based, we're going to attack." He didn't get into scheme but hinted there's a lot he throws at defense. He also noted part of it is "enjoyment" (which I took to refer to the players but could also refer to fans). In all these ways this is the other major pendulum swing/corrective to Shaw. Just a night and day difference in all these ways.
* Also notable that he emphasized the flexibility to adjust to what you have. Many have questioned whether Stanford has the personnel to run Taylor's offense. To hear Taylor talk that misses what he does. Sacramento State relied a lot on a tight end this year because he was one of their best players, but that's not set in stone. Some years he's had more dual threat kind of QBs and some more pocket passers. In his self-conception at least this flexibility is foundational, deserving of mention alongside all the talk about being dynamic and creating space. The immediacy of his results at Eastern Washington and Sacramento State supports this. I have pretty high confidence he'll take what the Stanford roster offers and come up with uses for players to create space. Over time he may recruit different kinds of players, but it does seem plausible that this offense isn't as much about personnel as some assume.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
* I like optimists so I I liked the line about going into every situation thinking it's going to work and then adapting when it doesn't work. Shaw talked about this too, but I think the players and fans stopped believing it long ago. I think a big part of the bump horrible teams can often get with a move like this is you start giving players permission to believe again. In some sense Taylor and Shaw can say the same things but the guy who hasn't driven the program into the ground will have a chance of getting people to believe, and that belief is a really big part of winning. And then of course if Taylor really can walk the walk in terms of adapting effectively when things aren't working that will be key to success.
* I don't want to get too carried away in praising his savvy on question on his Cal ties as that was the most obvious one in the world to have to answer and thus one he probably thought a lot about, but there was something slick and disarming about how he tackled that question. In essence, he praised Cal for forging him and made no apologies/defenses of himself for essentially no longer being a Bear. He's got a way of speaking that sounds (for all I know totally is) very genuine and grounded without falling into traps or seeming naive. I'm sure he'll fall in traps in press conferences to come, but this one was deftly handled.
* The way he talks about his time at Utah under Whittingham is somewhat more reserved than how he talks about some of his other experiences, which makes sense as that period was famously less of a success than all his others, but there's nonetheless a confidence in how he talks about that time being "invaluable" for him in getting Pac-12 game planning experience. My views haven't changed on how to think about that time (a relatively less positive mark on his resume but still one that provides some confidence as he was at least mediocre as a Pac-12 coordinator and presumably has grown since then). What's most notable and part of what I mean by reserved on this aspect is how quick he is to note how important all his stops were. Clearly he doesn't see Utah as the big formative stop in his journey.
* What he does seem to see as the big formative stop in his journey is the time in high school. He dwelled on two things here I found notable. First, he noted it's where he became a coach because he had to learn how to coach at different levels. That's an interesting way to think about it, and I think a refreshingly humble thing for somebody to say that he didn't really "coach" until the high school experience. Recall that he was a multi-year college position coach before that. This is a nice insight into what I was talking about earlier that we shouldn't necessarily turn our nose up at the benefits a high school perspective/experience can provide. Maybe somebody who's coached high school can scheme to utilize marginal athletes or get more out of a backup better than somebody with a more conventional background.
* The second thing he credited high school with doing for him was teaching him how to build a culture. This ("this game is all about culture") was the highlight of the press conference for me. I'm a broken record on this but I think it's what all of this comes down to. He'll succeed or fail based on the culture he builds. That he's so attentive to it inspires confidence. He defines culture as relationships, building a belief in yourself and your teammates, and going out with a great deal of confidence. If I had to boil down why I have more faith in Taylor going forward than I had in Shaw, this is it. Shaw was too aloof for me to believe in the relationships part and too accustomed to failure by the end for me to believe anybody in the program truly believed in themselves or their teammates. Taylor is a turning of the page and that alone is worth its weight in gold, but crucially he appears to believe in his culture-building philosophy and we've seen evidence we should believe too.
* Just as another data point on culture, his affection for his senior class at Sacramento State largely owes to how they "changed the climate." That this is his takeaway further reinforces how intentional and central culture building is for him. We're now going to want to hope past is prologue and that Taylor will be able to bring along current youngsters in the Stanford program to really change our climate. Even though he didn't recruit them, it's the current true freshman class and the incoming 2023 class that will define Taylor's culture building. Things to watch in the coming weeks, I think, are whether we can keep all the current freshmen in the fold (others are aggressively courting Bailey I'm sure) and whether we can add some volume to the 2023 class. Provided they're not scrubs, I'm all for adding more players to the 2023 class so that more people can come in with Taylor and be on the ground floor of the culture building. Think what Skattebo meant for Taylor at Sacramento State, or what Marecic and Masifilo meant for Harbaugh in the class he came in with.
* Ok, another culture data point (spoiler alert, I'm not going to stop talking about this for a long time): Taylor turned the question about adapting to the new transfer portal/NIL landscape as being about relationships and creating a culture. YES! He understands that the fundamental feature of the new system is choice and autonomy for student-athletes and that's not an inherently bad thing. His job is to make them want to stay. Yes, yes, yes. We can talk all we want about Stanford becoming more permissive of transfers, but what will really be pivotal to Stanford competing in this environment is being a program people want to play at. We're not that anymore. What Taylor understands and will strive to do is making us that kind of program. Culture. It's all about culture.
* The specific way Taylor says he wants to create culture - making players feel like a family because they feel valued, accepted, and challenged for who they are as individuals (read: different for different players) and being authentic in how you do that - will take relationships and emotional intelligence. It's not just pretty words in a press conference or team meeting. I don't know the man and can't comment on his ability to do that (other than to say it seems like he did it at Folsom and Sacramento State) but I'm getting good vibes.
* Proof will be in the pudding but I love that he said he wants players to complete their athletic careers at Stanford. This was in direct response to the question on navigating the transfer portal dynamics. I am hoping (and encouraged by this answer) that he gets that the mentality of so many Stanford people that it's only natural for players to transfer out to get grad degrees elsewhere is a loser's mentality when you're talking about players the football team actually needs.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
- * Zero surprise (and would have been quite shocking and even potentially alarming if he said otherwise) that he will be the offensive coordinator and call the plays. I don't believe you hire a head coach who has succeeded as a head coach in large part because of the rhythms he's developed as an innovative and effective play caller and then have him hand that over. I know Stanford fans are scarred by the Shaw experience. But this is not that. This is more like Lincoln Riley/Ryan Day/Mike Leach (RIP)/Steve Sarkisian/Jimbo Fisher/Chip Kelly/Jeff Brohm/Hugh Freeze - head coaches who are good head coaches in large part because they own their successful offenses. The success can't always be sustained (see Fisher, Paul Chryst, etc.) - Shawpologists might put our old coach in that category (whereas most of us would say he always stunk at this). But the idea of bringing Taylor on board to not call the plays makes no sense to me. So this isn't really news, even though it's a foundational aspect of his staff/approach.
- * Similarly totally unsurprising he'd say he'd hire a defensive coordinator and let him do his thing. This goes without saying and I think he only said it as a contrast to the lack of an offensive coordinator. "Good people don't like to be micro-managed" was an attractive glimpse of managerial philosophy. Yes my hypocrisy is showing after all my years chafing at Shaw's indifference to defense, though in my defense Taylor did say he's hands-on and likes to be involved in all aspects of the team as the head coach. That's really what I want - not micro-managing, but the head coach really being invested on the defensive side too and not just offense. It was interesting to hear Taylor's emphasis on getting an "extraordinary" defensive coordinator. It doesn't mean anything until we see who it is, just a bit of a glimpse at ambition, confidence, and not trying to manage expectations at all.
- * It's probably worthy of a whole different thread to speculate on the defensive coordinator as this is arguably the most important decision Taylor will make in at least his entire first year on the Farm. So critical. We had major news today that Andy Thompson will replace Taylor at Sacramento State. That removes one obvious candidate from the equation, though it's not clear Taylor wanted his FCS coordinator to join him (and my guess was Taylor aimed higher from the start). We've heard rumblings the Chris Petersen tree and/or NFL may be sources for Taylor. Will be super interesting to see who it is. At the risk of opening a can of worms, the Petersen tree talk has me unable to get my mind off of the idea of Stanford taking a bold step and giving Jimmy Lake a redemption opportunity. That would be epically splashy, though I do understand he has skeletons in his closet.
- * I get the sense the praise of Shaw's staff was diplomatic and the subsequent reference to the "right fit" was more meaningful. I suspect he'll jettison the prior guys (and we've already seen numerous confirmations) and use "fit" as the rationale. The Petersen philosophy of high integrity, high output, low ego sounds great, as does wanting guys who are on a continual quest to get better and don't think they've arrived (more great management philosophy turns of phrase) but again proof will be in the pudding. So far I believe we've seen three hires announced. Yesterday there was the Klayton Adams news, which on paper seems like a great resume and very credible fit but IMHO with OL is always a big question/unknown because it's arguably the most important position coach in the sport and you can't always judge so easily from on paper resumes. Tonight I see Football Scoop reporting that Tyler Osbourne (wide receivers) and Malcolm Agnew (running backs) are joining from Sacramento State. That breaking news tonight makes me happy. I pointed out things I liked about these guys - apparent rising stars, young guys (so hopefully hungry and energetic and ready to recruit), Pac-12 ties, impressive coaching mentors, multiple years of experience on the dynamic Sacramento State offensive staff. I wouldn't want Taylor to either have lazy recruiters (let's be honest....RB and WR coaches are probably more important for recruiting than anything else) or unknown quantities on his offensive staff, so I like what I've seen so far. One thing of note is that these hires seem to definitively close the door on Gould remaining on staff and come very close to closing the door on Pritchard. I suppose QB coach is still possible.
- * I do like having some continuity from the Sacramento State offensive staff. It would have made me nervous to see Taylor with a totally new staff. Harbaugh had Shaw, Drevno, and Anderson come from San Diego. Klieman had four guys come from North Dakota State. Having 3-4 of the staff be continuous strikes me as prudent. I kind of hope we see 1-2 more Sacramento State coaches. Again, I like the two he's started with. On paper, Valeria and/or Whitfield (I prefer Valeria but understand Whitfield is a Stanford Man) would make sense, but my suspicion is Taylor is prudently not making defensive hires until the coordinator is in place. It would be dumb to fill out assistant spots before a coordinator, as the coordinator's own position expertise, coaching philosophy, team he's bringing if any, etc. should all play into defensive hires.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
msqueri - 12-13-2022
* On conference affiliation, "I trust our leadership, wherever that is" sounded to me like Stanford's future in the college football firmament was part of his conversations with university leadership and either we don't know where it's headed or there's a good chance it's not the Pac-12. The main clue here is how fully he leaned in to a frame of argument that minimized the importance of conference and emphasized that Stanford is Stanford and will remain Stanford. It's also possible he's just slickly pivoting to the good PR message, but it caught my attention. The wishful thinker in me continues to hear comments like this and hope Stanford football's future can be brighter joining USC in the Big 10. There's another way to read this that Taylor has reason to believe Stanford is going independent or contemplating dropping down (to the extent he's minimizing the importance of conference affiliation). What does seem clear to me is that it seems unlikely Taylor would have answered this way if status quo writing was on the wall.
* The media love the Patu/Folsom angle. Fair enough. It's interesting. Taylor is an offensive-minded coach whose QB just left for the NFL and whose heir apparent went (can't really say played!) at the high school at which Taylor became a legend. Yeah, it's a story. But I always judge spontaneous comments as more meaningful than politic answers to leading questions. Just not sure what, if anything, we can read into the answer on Patu. Good that Taylor emphasized competition, but what else was he going to do? Based on track record, a role for both Patu and Daniels very plausibly could be in the cards, but it's also the case that based on the new landscape in college football the whole thing could be shuffled by an incoming transfer. My general posture is it's too early right now to talk authoritatively about Stanford's 2023 position competitions and a reporter asking Taylor about Patu doesn't change that.
* I'm going to try to wait for more data points before assessing how I feel about Taylor's orientation toward self-selectors and the types of players he'll recruit to Stanford. That's been my two decade long obsession and I'll surely be paying attention to how Taylor talks and acts in this regard. At first blush the way he talked about the draw recruits have to Stanford resonated with me, but it's quite possible (probably really) I'm still on an anybody but Shaw high. Basically, I don't know if I'm in the frame of mind to objectively evaluate some of these comments.
* I watched a lot of David Shaw over the last 15 years. A lot. My psycho-analyzing was therefore based on a lot of data points and a lot of comparing rhetoric versus reality. I don't have any of that with Troy Taylor. I'm sure some of my attempts at observations are bogus at this early stage. But it's fun to try to get to know this new coach and assess whether he might fix what ails us. Clear eyes, full hearts, can't lose!
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
SkiBum80 - 12-14-2022
Thanks as usual msqueri so many excellent insights.
Couple quick things I'm liking about Taylor as a hire;
First to be a slight contrarian, I think getting someone already with a certain experience is a bit overrated.
Better is to get someone with the needed skills and talent but who has not yet achieved that experience.
Taylor has never been FBS head coach, never led a Pac 12 team, never won a Pac-12 championship, etc.
So all of that will be blazing new ground for him, and I think can make him more hungry and determined to get there than some other who's already been there, done that.
Second, I like where I read somewhere that he's likely chopping the Stanford play book way down.
Perhaps throwing out and starting from scratch.
This is welcome news.
So many of our plays in recent years have seen our offense look confused, bewildered, and worst of all, slow to develop.
It seemed like we were trying to confuse the defense but only ended up dillydallying and confusing ourselves more so, as their DL made a jail break to party in our backfield.
The slow mesh was the ultimate nadir of this sad development.
Sounds like Taylor will go complete opposite of this with fast tempo and fast developing plays.
RE: Troy Taylor's introductory press conference this am -
Spiny_Norman - 12-14-2022
Coach Taylor said that he recognizes that he will have to adapt his approach to the talent on the team. It will be interesting to see what he can do with a fast offense run by slow players. That has to be a recruiting priority for years to come - increase team speed on both sides of the ball.