The CardBoard
Stanford-ND prediction thread - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-ND prediction thread (/thread-10769.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - vataha - 11-27-2015

Stanford-35
Notre Dame-31


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - PalmTree - 11-27-2015

VERY nervous about this game....but, in Anderson and Akina we trust

Ents: 34
Leprechauns: 31


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - pcgoode - 11-27-2015

Notre Dame's run defense isn't that great.  They are giving up close to 170 yards a game.  CMac behind our Oline will be a real test for Notre Dame.


(11-27-2015, 09:59 AM)JPRI link Wrote:[quote author=CrazedZooChimp link=topic=13735.msg143823#msg143823 date=1448605796]
Stanford - 41
Notato - 31

McCaffrey breaks his own record with 400 APY.

We may win the game, but I doubt CMac is going to break any records. ND will be all over him like white on rice.
Hogan might break a few.
[/quote]


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - SamAtoms1980 - 11-27-2015

Stanford 29
N.D. 23


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - GoodGrief - 11-27-2015

Us 42
Them 10

The McLovin' (thanks whoever coined that, I like that) backfield results in Legolas with 229 rushing yards and Love with 2 breakaway touchdowns and 169 rushing yards.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - amartinsu13 - 11-27-2015

(11-27-2015, 12:36 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:Us 42
Them 10

The McLovin' (thanks whoever coined that, I like that) backfield results in Legolas with 229 rushing yards and Love with 2 breakaway touchdowns and 169 rushing yards.

I like the optimism.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Extra Point - 11-27-2015

Stanford      38
Notre Dame  20


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - GoodGrief - 11-27-2015

(11-27-2015, 12:40 PM)amartinsu13 link Wrote:[quote author=GoodGrief link=topic=13735.msg143852#msg143852 date=1448652965]
Us 42
Them 10

The McLovin' (thanks whoever coined that, I like that) backfield results in Legolas with 229 rushing yards and Love with 2 breakaway touchdowns and 169 rushing yards.

I like the optimism.
[/quote]

What I lack in actual sports knowledge, I make up for in optimism and enthusiasm. This also applies to my cheerleading and mascotting careers.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Durty Nelly - 11-27-2015

Trees  31
UDFG  27


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Hey - 11-27-2015

Red: 20
Green: 27


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - SUBuddha - 11-27-2015

Guess I should get this in, I trust the spread:

Leland Stanford Jr. University 42
Crying Whyrish 27


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - CTcard - 11-27-2015

Big Red Trees 35
Little Green Men 28


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - pefloresjr - 11-27-2015

Stanford 34
Ethnic stereotypes 30

Cheers,
Pete F.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - cardfan77 - 11-28-2015

Stanford 35
Lennay Kekua University -24


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Brannerite - 11-28-2015

Stanford 31
Why Must They Fight? 27


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - FarmBoy - 11-28-2015

Stanford 38
ND 33


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - JohnR34231 - 11-28-2015

(11-27-2015, 12:36 PM)GoodGrief link Wrote:Us 42
Them 10

The McLovin' (thanks whoever coined that, I like that) backfield results in Legolas with 229 rushing yards and Love with 2 breakaway touchdowns and 169 rushing yards.

If anyone wants to bet on Stanford and give 32 points I'm sure they won't have any problem finding plenty of takers.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - Hank 91 - 11-28-2015

Me: Stanford 37, Notre Dame 31.
Opposing Blogger: Notre Dame 33, Stanford 30.


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - BigEasyCard - 11-28-2015

Stanford 38
Notre Dame 31

Geaux Cardinal!


Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread - winflop - 11-29-2015

(11-23-2015, 05:23 PM)winflop link Wrote:Fighting Shaws 38
Fighting Amish 27

I think this was the first time this season I even got one team's score right.  Then again, even a stopped clock is right twice a day, so there's that.