Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Hulk01 - 11-29-2015
Hats of the Farmboy. If ND had missed a field goal, he would have had the exact final score.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
FarmBoy - 11-29-2015
I foresaw exactly how it would play out including the last second fg. Except I had anticipated jitters on the part of the nd kicker. ..
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
winflop - 11-29-2015
(11-29-2015, 01:26 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:I foresaw exactly how it would play out including the last second fg. Except I had anticipated jitters on the part of the nd kicker. ..
I guess I will be seeing you in IMAX 3D in about 3 weeks?
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
FarmBoy - 11-29-2015
Sorry, I only appear in the original trilogy
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
BostonCard - 11-29-2015
| Stanford | UDFG | Difference | Error | Modified Error | Points | Penalty/Bonus | Total Points |
| FarmBoy | 38 | 33 | 5 | 3 | 4.5 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| PalmTree | 34 | 31 | 3 | 9 | 5.5 | 50 | 0 | 50 |
| David Lombardi | 35 | 31 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 48 |
| vataha | 35 | 31 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 48 | 0 | 48 |
| pcgoode | 34 | 30 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 46 |
| pefloresjr | 34 | 30 | 4 | 10 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 46 |
| Hank 91 | 37 | 31 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 46 | 0 | 46 |
| washingtonismoney | 38 | 31 | 7 | 5 | 7.5 | 43 | 0 | 43 |
| CornFed | 38 | 31 | 7 | 5 | 7.5 | 43 | 0 | 43 |
| BigEasyCard | 38 | 31 | 7 | 5 | 7.5 | 43 | 0 | 43 |
| thunder_chick | 31 | 28 | 3 | 15 | 8.5 | 40 | 0 | 40 |
| garvin | 35 | 38 | -3 | 5 | 5.5 | 50 | -10 | 40 |
| martyup | 32 | 28 | 4 | 14 | 9 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
| CrazedZooChimp | 41 | 31 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 39 | 0 | 39 |
| Publius | 30 | 27 | 3 | 17 | 9.5 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| Opposing Blogger | 33 | 28 | 5 | 13 | 9.5 | 37 | 0 | 37 |
| hurlburt88 | 31 | 27 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| JPRI | 31 | 27 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Durty Nelly | 31 | 27 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Las Vegas Spread | 31 | 27 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| 81alum | 28 | 27 | 1 | 19 | 10.5 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| CTcard | 35 | 28 | 7 | 11 | 10.5 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| standfan | 45 | 34 | 11 | 9 | 11.5 | 28 | 0 | 28 |
| Kevin Gemmell | 38 | 28 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| NYCCardinalFan | 27 | 24 | 3 | 23 | 12.5 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Kyle Bonagura | 31 | 35 | -4 | 8 | 10 | 35 | -10 | 25 |
| Mick | 28 | 24 | 4 | 22 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| MSmith23 | 28 | 24 | 4 | 22 | 13 | 24 | 0 | 24 |
| winflop | 38 | 27 | 11 | 9 | 13.5 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Boston Card | 42 | 28 | 14 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| 82lsju | 31 | 24 | 7 | 19 | 14.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| leftcoast | 31 | 24 | 7 | 19 | 14.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Kathy | 31 | 24 | 7 | 19 | 14.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Chantel Jennings | 31 | 24 | 7 | 19 | 14.5 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
| Ted Miller | 30 | 35 | -5 | 9 | 11.5 | 28 | -10 | 18 |
| SamAtoms1980 | 29 | 23 | 6 | 22 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| SUBuddha | 42 | 27 | 15 | 13 | 15.5 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Wilner | 31 | 23 | 8 | 20 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| 2 for 2028 | 34 | 24 | 10 | 16 | 16 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| cardfan77 | 35 | 24 | 11 | 15 | 16.5 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Papa John | 27 | 21 | 6 | 26 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| JJJ | 28 | 20 | 8 | 26 | 19 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| amartinsu13 | 42 | 24 | 18 | 16 | 20 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Stymie | 31 | 20 | 11 | 23 | 20.5 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| FarmDad.01 | 38 | 20 | 18 | 16 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Extra Point | 38 | 20 | 2 | 16 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| fullmetal | 34 | 17 | 17 | 23 | 26.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| GoodGrief | 42 | 10 | 32 | 30 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Hulk01 | 63 | 0 | 63 | 61 | 66.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Big Brother | 20 | 27 | -7 | 27 | 22.5 | 7 | -10 | -3 |
| teejers1 | 21 | 38 | -17 | 19 | 26.5 | 4 | -10 | -6 |
| Median | 34 | 27 | 7.3 | | | | | |
| Average | 34.0 | 26.4 | 7.3 | | | | | |
| Actual Score | 38 | 36 | 2 | | | | | |
Congrats to Farmboy, who was a field goal away from nailing the score. Overall, we underestimated our offense's ability to score (so it is hard to square with the criticisms of the offensive playcalling), and overestimated our defense's ability to stop them (though I guess 7 of those points are on the special teams).
BC
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Hank 91 - 11-30-2015
(11-28-2015, 12:26 PM)Hank 91 link Wrote:Me: Stanford 37, the University of Dead Fake Girlfriends 31.
Opposing Blogger: the University of Dead Fake Girlfriends 33, Stanford 30.
Not that it matters that much, but here's the actual score prediction from the opposing blogger.
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
winflop - 11-30-2015
Well now we have objective proof that you're better Hank :)
Re: Stanford-ND prediction thread -
Brannerite - 11-30-2015
I think my quite unoriginal prediction of 31-27, which turned out to be both the mode of our set as well as the Vegas spread, is missing from the results?