The CardBoard
Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford @ UCLA predictions (/thread-12672.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - 2 for 2028 - 09-22-2016

Stanford 30
UCLA 20

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - BostonCard - 09-22-2016

(09-22-2016, 01:37 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:Time to put up. I'm guessing someone's used this theme already, but recycling is good for the earth:

School Josh Rosen attends: 24
School Josh Rosen wanted to attend: 31

Wilner picks us to win and beat the spread, but that is a bit of cheating since he's using the opening spread instead of the current one.

For some reason, Ted Miller is the one ESPN blogger I don't want to see picking against the herd/us.

No, Wilner picked us to beat the current spread... to his credit.  His quote:

Quote:STANFORD (minus-3) at UCLA: The line inexplicably opened with UCLA as a 1-pt favorite but has swung so dramatically that I feel compelled to play the current number, which, by the way, is still too low. The Cardinal has won the past three by at least 14 points. How much has really changed? Pick: Stanford.

BC

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - pcgoode - 09-22-2016

(09-22-2016, 01:37 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:For some reason, Ted Miller is the one ESPN blogger I don't want to see picking against the herd/us.

I agree that Ted is one of the better analysts of PAC 12 football, but interestingly enough, he has a self-described Stanford problem.  Every year for the last number of years, he hasn't picked Stanford to win the PAC 12, and sure enough, we've prove him wrong too often.  This year he decided he had been wrong too many times with his pre-season picks so he picked the Cardinal.  I wonder if his pick against us this weekend is the "old" Ted resurrecting himself or if he has some other reason to pick the Bruins.



Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Hey - 09-22-2016

North: 27
South: 21

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - stupac2 - 09-22-2016

(09-22-2016, 02:30 PM)pcgoode link Wrote:[quote author=FarmBoy link=topic=15712.msg172370#msg172370 date=1474576643]

For some reason, Ted Miller is the one ESPN blogger I don't want to see picking against the herd/us.

I agree that Ted is one of the better analysts of PAC 12 football, but interestingly enough, he has a self-described Stanford problem.  Every year for the last number of years, he hasn't picked Stanford to win the PAC 12, and sure enough, we've prove him wrong too often.  This year he decided he had been wrong too many times with his pre-season picks so he picked the Cardinal.  I wonder if his pick against us this weekend is the "old" Ted resurrecting himself or if he has some other reason to pick the Bruins.
[/quote]

This game hinges on one thing: Which UCLA defense is real, the one that let up 5 ypc to Nevada or the one that let up <1 ypc to BYU? If it's the former, we ought to win comfortably, if it's the latter, then it's tight and picking the home team is reasonable.

I think we can do a reasonable job of shutting down UCLA's offense and keeping them <20, but can we score that against them? I think the tenor of the game will be obvious after the first two drives, but I'm not super confident going in.

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - JJJ - 09-22-2016

Trees Bring The Wood: 34
Hollywood/Westwood: 24

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Card Fan in OR - 09-22-2016

Cardinal:    31

Bruin:        16

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Leftcoast - 09-23-2016

School of John Elway, Jim Plunkett and Andrew Luck:  34
School of Heather Locklear, Brooke Burke and Gabrielle Union: 17

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - TriangleTree - 09-23-2016



arboles 27
osos 21

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - indiancardinal - 09-23-2016

Stanford 30
UCLA    20

Cardinal Offense will put up 3 TDs and a field goal in 3 quarters.  Our D will finally be good for 6 points after being held to just 2 points in the first two games.


Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - 81alum - 09-23-2016

Stanford 24
UCLA 19

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - pcgoode - 09-23-2016

My week won't be complete until Teejers makes his pick...

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - Row80Critic - 09-23-2016

34-17 Stanford  :)

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - washingtonismoney - 09-23-2016

Vegas: 25-22 Stanford wins.

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - GoodGrief - 09-23-2016

The School That I Went To And Love 35
The School That I Live Down The Street From And Kinda Like But Whose Stadium Is Still Too Durned Far Away For Me To Attend The Game In Person Because Anything Farther than A Mile Is Too Far With A Toddler 17

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - FarmBoy - 09-23-2016

Quote:No, Wilner picked us to beat the current spread... to his credit.  His quote:

Oops, not sure how I missed that. I've never seen him pick by the spread later in the week. It's odd that he chose to do it on this one with a 4 pt spread when he's used the opening spread in the past despite much bigger line moves. A quick check of how he did other games shows that he used the opening lines for UtahvsSC, ColvsOr, and CalvsASU.

While I'll defend his AP rank voting oddities, I can't explain away this...

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - CTcard - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:21 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:
Quote:No, Wilner picked us to beat the current spread... to his credit.  His quote:


While I'll defend his AP rank voting oddities, I can't explain away this...

I think it basically comes down to Wilner being confident that Stanford will win by a reasonable amount, so feels comfortable picking against the current spread.

As others have noted, that makes me nervous.

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - stupac2 - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:21 PM)FarmBoy link Wrote:
Quote:No, Wilner picked us to beat the current spread... to his credit.  His quote:

Oops, not sure how I missed that. I've never seen him pick by the spread later in the week. It's odd that he chose to do it on this one with a 4 pt spread when he's used the opening spread in the past despite much bigger line moves. A quick check of how he did other games shows that he used the opening lines for UtahvsSC, ColvsOr, and CalvsASU.

While I'll defend his AP rank voting oddities, I can't explain away this...

He will occasionally use the updated lines, I don't follow lines at all so I have no idea how often, but he's definitely done it before.

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - CrazedZooChimp - 09-23-2016

(09-23-2016, 02:28 PM)stupac2 link Wrote:[quote author=FarmBoy link=topic=15712.msg172439#msg172439 date=1474665715]
Quote:No, Wilner picked us to beat the current spread... to his credit.  His quote:

Oops, not sure how I missed that. I've never seen him pick by the spread later in the week. It's odd that he chose to do it on this one with a 4 pt spread when he's used the opening spread in the past despite much bigger line moves. A quick check of how he did other games shows that he used the opening lines for UtahvsSC, ColvsOr, and CalvsASU.

While I'll defend his AP rank voting oddities, I can't explain away this...

He will occasionally use the updated lines, I don't follow lines at all so I have no idea how often, but he's definitely done it before.
[/quote]

Yeah, he usually does it if the line has changed by a large amount or changed which team was favored between when it opened and he posts (like it did with us this week, 4 points is a big swing).

Re: Stanford @ UCLA predictions - BostonCard - 09-23-2016

He supposedly does it when the line moves substantially.  But as others have noted, there have been biggish line moves where he has gone with the opening line.  My guess is that if the line change doesn't materially alter his opinion, he will use the updated line.

BC