Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - Printable Version
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread (/thread-16882.html)
+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread (/thread-16882.html)
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - French Rage - 11-24-2018
WTF WTF
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - d4cohn - 11-24-2018
Just run QB sneak. We gifted them two points. Squanders Adebo's big play.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - PVTree - 11-24-2018
Fudge! Where's the blocking?
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-24-2018
How the hell do you let a guy get into our backfield completely unblocked.
BC
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - French Rage - 11-24-2018
Why was he so far back? I could see that coming a mile away.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - stupac2 - 11-24-2018
How do you screw that up? Jesus, what a waste of Adebo's great pick.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - JPR36 - 11-24-2018
(11-24-2018, 03:59 PM)PVTree Wrote: Fudge! Where's the blocking?
You might ask where has it been all year.
Hopefully that won't turn out to be the difference in the game.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - d4cohn - 11-24-2018
Unbelievable. Chalk up terrible playcall to now 9 points.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - PVTree - 11-24-2018
Double-Fudge!!!
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - stupac2 - 11-24-2018
What the *****.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - thunder_chik - 11-24-2018
Disastrous, atrocious.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - d4cohn - 11-24-2018
The game was in sights. Now UCLA can take the lead if Stanford messes up on one drive.
lex24 - lex24 - 11-24-2018
Terrible play call? Why. They handed it to their AA back. Hall whiffed. Its amazing, when a play doesn’t work it’s always coaches fault. Did you praise the third and nine draw to love that gained 20 yards earlier in the game. Of course if it got stuffed you would’ve said it was a lousy call.
(11-24-2018, 04:01 PM)d4cohn Wrote: Unbelievable. Chalk up terrible playcall to now 9 points.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - thunder_chik - 11-24-2018
Major momentum shift. We may be totally screwed.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - JPR36 - 11-24-2018
(11-24-2018, 04:03 PM)d4cohn Wrote: The game was in sights. Now UCLA can take the lead if Stanford messes up on one drive.
Holy ^$#@. What a crazy game. A little of everything.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - BostonCard - 11-24-2018
Unfriggin believable. I thought the adebo interception could have sealed it, but instead it is down to a five point game.
BC
RE: lex24 - d4cohn - 11-24-2018
(11-24-2018, 04:04 PM)lex24 Wrote: Terrible play call? Why. They handed it to their AA back. Hall whiffed. Its amazing, when a play doesn’t work it’s always coaches fault. Did you praise the third and nine draw to love that gained 20 yards earlier in the game. Of course if it got stuffed you would’ve said it was a lousy call.
(11-24-2018, 04:01 PM)d4cohn Wrote: Unbelievable. Chalk up terrible playcall to now 9 points.
Actually, I have generally really liked Shawvita's playcalling throughout most of this season. I was in favor, for example, of how Shawvita managed the clock against ASU (despite the disagreements from others on this board). You could tell the pressure was coming right up the middle, and we were awfully close to the goalline. A QB sneak gets you a bit more breathing room. No complaints on that call if we run that from 5 or 6. When you run that from 3, you risk someone making an error that leads to points.
RE: Stanford-UCLA Game Thread - thunder_chik - 11-24-2018
Where is martyup? We need an appropriate visual here, por favor. May I suggest one of Touche Turtle?
RE: lex24 - BostonCard - 11-24-2018
(11-24-2018, 04:04 PM)lex24 Wrote: Terrible play call? Why. They handed it to their AA back. Hall whiffed. Its amazing, when a play doesn’t work it’s always coaches fault. Did you praise the third and nine draw to love that gained 20 yards earlier in the game. Of course if it got stuffed you would’ve said it was a lousy call.
(11-24-2018, 04:01 PM)d4cohn Wrote: Unbelievable. Chalk up terrible playcall to now 9 points.
Yeah, most coaches would call a run from the end zone to give yourself some space. But how a senior Multi year starter could totally whif on a block is beyond me. I mean, we have trouble with our offensive line, but seriously, putting a body in front of the guy trying to tackle your ball carrier is football 101.
BC
lex24 - lex24 - 11-24-2018
Fair enough. One thing, they don’t run sneaks. I can’t recall the last time
(11-24-2018, 04:09 PM)d4cohn Wrote:(11-24-2018, 04:04 PM)lex24 Wrote: Terrible play call? Why. They handed it to their AA back. Hall whiffed. Its amazing, when a play doesn’t work it’s always coaches fault. Did you praise the third and nine draw to love that gained 20 yards earlier in the game. Of course if it got stuffed you would’ve said it was a lousy call.
(11-24-2018, 04:01 PM)d4cohn Wrote: Unbelievable. Chalk up terrible playcall to now 9 points.
Actually, I have generally really liked Shawvita's playcalling throughout most of this season. I was in favor, for example, of how Shawvita managed the clock against ASU (despite the disagreements from others on this board). You could tell the pressure was coming right up the middle, and we were awfully close to the goalline. A QB sneak gets you a bit more breathing room. No complaints on that call if we run that from 5 or 6. When you run that from 3, you risk someone making an error that leads to points.