The CardBoard
2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel (/thread-16215.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 12-01-2018

Anybody who frequented Rivals when IBS was a freshman probably remember a poster, his mom if I recall, who likened the kid to Jesus, Ghandi, Jim Hines, Armin Hary, Elroy Hirsch and Bob Hayes.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-01-2018

Saw IBS on the sidelines. I'm about 80% sure he was not dressed out.

As far as his lack of PT this year, it could be injury. But I don't know. I actually was surprised that he was invited back for a fifth year given that he was never a significant contributor. My uneducated guess has actually always been that there was some sort of wink-wink agreement between track and football that kept IBS on scholarship in FB, enabling him to stay for a fifth year to compete in his final season of eligibility for indoor track.

-m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-05-2018

Frosh Force. Ten true freshmen played against Kal. I really like the new redshirt rule a lot. One of the reasons I like it is because it allows freshmen who have busted their tail in practice all season to be rewarded toward the end of the year; I am guessing that is one of reasons that Kaufusi and Symonds got PT, though I am not suggesting that they are not also talented. Also, it allows us to play freshmen selectively and still have them retain a redshirt; under the old rule, no way ten freshmen see the field for Big Game.

-m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Phogge - 12-05-2018

Bonner played at least one series late in the game at CB.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - CTcard - 12-05-2018

(12-05-2018, 01:43 PM)Langdude Wrote:  
  • WR Simi Fehoko played in his third game. He had no catches. When Trent Irwin went down, I was surprised that they did not use him more considering how much he was featured against UCLA.
  • WR Michael Wilson had a catch for 5 yards; as with Fehoko, I am surprised he was not more featured. Has played in every game this season.

Fehoko was kind of featured vs UCLA, but had zero catches and one offensive PI. While that won't get you playing time, I am still optimistic about his future.
Wilson really did have kind of a breakout game vs UCLA. He had 4 catches for 41 yards, season highs by a lot. I thought we'd see more of him in the cal game.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-05-2018

(12-05-2018, 03:12 PM)CTcard Wrote:  
(12-05-2018, 01:43 PM)Langdude Wrote:  
  • WR Simi Fehoko played in his third game. He had no catches. When Trent Irwin went down, I was surprised that they did not use him more considering how much he was featured against UCLA.
  • WR Michael Wilson had a catch for 5 yards; as with Fehoko, I am surprised he was not more featured. Has played in every game this season.

Fehoko was kind of featured vs UCLA, but had zero catches and one offensive PI. While that won't get you playing time, I am still optimistic about his future.
Wilson really did have kind of a breakout game vs UCLA. He had 4 catches for 41 yards, season highs by a lot. I thought we'd see more of him in the cal game.

I noted their performances above, in my personnel review of the UCLA game. Getting targeted in the endzone is "featured" enough to be significant. But he was not against Kal. Neither was Wilson. That confused me, but I guess they felt good about playing Connor Wedington against Kal, which presumably means we'll see more of Fehoko and Wilson in the bowl game, especially if Trent Irwin is not on the field.

-m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - CTcard - 12-05-2018

(12-05-2018, 03:23 PM)Langdude Wrote:  I noted their performances above, in my personnel review of the UCLA game. Getting targeted in the endzone is "featured" enough to be significant. But he was not against Kal. Neither was Wilson. That confused me, but I guess they felt good about playing Connor Wedington against Kal, which presumably means we'll see more of Fehoko and Wilson in the bowl game, especially if Trent Irwin is not on the field.

-m.

Wasn't disagreeing, just expanding.

If Irwin doesn't make the bowl game that will be sad, particularly for him, but it will be interesting to see who plays and gets thrown to - given that Wedington will reportedly be out to preserve the redshirt year. My money would be on Wilson, then St. Brown getting more throws, but I remain intrigued by Fehoko.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - newguy - 12-05-2018

(12-05-2018, 03:30 PM)CTcard Wrote:  
(12-05-2018, 03:23 PM)Langdude Wrote:  I noted their performances above, in my personnel review of the UCLA game. Getting targeted in the endzone is "featured" enough to be significant. But he was not against Kal. Neither was Wilson. That confused me, but I guess they felt good about playing Connor Wedington against Kal, which presumably means we'll see more of Fehoko and Wilson in the bowl game, especially if Trent Irwin is not on the field.

-m.

Wasn't disagreeing, just expanding. 

If Irwin doesn't make the bowl game that will be sad, particularly for him, but it will be interesting to see who plays and gets thrown to  - given that Wedington will reportedly be out to preserve the redshirt year. My money would be on Wilson, then St. Brown getting more throws, but I remain intrigued by Fehoko.

i'm hoping to see more of Osiris.
this kid has real potential.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-06-2018

(12-05-2018, 03:30 PM)CTcard Wrote:  
(12-05-2018, 03:23 PM)Langdude Wrote:  I noted their performances above, in my personnel review of the UCLA game. Getting targeted in the endzone is "featured" enough to be significant. But he was not against Kal. Neither was Wilson. That confused me, but I guess they felt good about playing Connor Wedington against Kal, which presumably means we'll see more of Fehoko and Wilson in the bowl game, especially if Trent Irwin is not on the field.

-m.

Wasn't disagreeing, just expanding.

If Irwin doesn't make the bowl game that will be sad, particularly for him, but it will be interesting to see who plays and gets thrown to  - given that Wedington will reportedly be out to preserve the redshirt year. My money would be on Wilson, then St. Brown getting more throws, but I remain intrigued by Fehoko.

I'm also intrigued by Fehoko! I think they are wanting to use him like they did JJAW, though I think JJAW's athleticism and incredibly strong and sure hands are pretty rare.

Thanks, CT.

-m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-06-2018

Redshirt Watch. Here's some notations on possible redshirts and burns. As a reminder, you can play in four games and still be eligible to redshirt. -m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Hurlburt88 - 12-07-2018

A Wedington move to RB would not surprise me given his HS career, and might make a lot of sense for us.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 12-07-2018

Well, we have Scarlett, Speights, and Maddox, plus Woods redshirting and Jones coming in.  So there is no lack of bodies at RB; the question is how confident we can be that one of those bodies will produce next year.  When Love became the running back in 2017, it had been on the tail of a 783 yard campaign in 2016 backing up McCaffrey.   When McCaffrey became the starter in 2015, he had 300 yards and 7.1 ypc the year before (most of it coming towards the end of the season).  And when Gaffney came back from a year in he minor leagues in 2013, he had 449 yards and 6.1 ypc backing up Stepfan Taylor two years before that.  

By those metrics, there is reasonable confidence that Scarlett could be a credible starter; he's been our second leading rusher the last two years, and though his 236 yards on 57 carries are less than any of the prior successful incumbents, they are more than what we had in 2014, the only time in recent memory when we truly struggled to identify a primary RB (Remound Wright, our putative starter and leading rusher, had 102 yards on 20 carries in 2013).  Plus Scarlett has 389 yards on 91 carries last year.  He has been a solid, if not spectacular backup running back.  Also, Scarlett has had a decent showing the last two years catching the ball out of the backfield, and that adds an element to his game (to be fair, we'd expect Wedington to be an excellent receiver out of the backfield as well).

Nor is there a lot of proven returning talent at WR (Irwin and, almost certainly, JJAW will be gone).  Wilson and OSB (and perhaps Fehoko) are promising, but Weddington had comparable production last year, and in limited action this year.  Weddington has a chance to be a starter at WR next year, and he would almost certainly be in the two-deep barring any surprises.  At running back, while there is always a chance that Weddington could supplant Scarlett, the baseline assumption is that he is less likely to compete to start at RB than he is to compete to start at WR. 

Put it all together, and I think your WR corps looks like: Wilson/Weddington/St Brown/Fehoko, (plus perhaps Bowman) and the RB rotation looks like Scarlett/Speights/Maddox/Woods (plus perhaps Jones).

BC


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - BobK - 12-07-2018

Plus incoming Frosh Peat


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-10-2018

Walk-on Warriors. The following non-scholarship players got PT against Kal. -m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-14-2018

As you may have noticed, I've been spreading out my Big Game personnel notes. Consider it a way to occupy my time in the season/bowl interregnum.

Bench Bunch. The following non-freshman non-injured scholarship players did not appear against Kal. -m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - BobK - 12-14-2018

Are you sure about Williams and Wilson ?
I thought they both played.

Wilson accepted into a Stanford grad school btw


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 12-31-2018

Pre-Game Notes!

M*A*S*H Unit. By way of the declared starting units, let's go by position. -m.


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - BostonCard - 01-02-2019

I'm wondering whether this chart should be updated in anticipation of the 2019 season, with the removal of those who have decided not to use up their last year of eligibility, and shifting players who used up a year of eligibility over one cell.  It will be useful as we examine needs for the 2020 recruiting class.

BC


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - CompSci87 - 01-02-2019

(01-02-2019, 08:24 PM)BostonCard Wrote:  I'm wondering whether this chart should be updated in anticipation of the 2019 season, with the removal of those who have decided not to use up their last year of eligibility, and shifting players who used up a year of eligibility over one cell.  It will be useful as we examine needs for the 2020 recruiting class.

BC

Maybe do that in a new thread for 2019 personnel?


RE: 2018 Stanford Football Personnel - Langdude - 01-02-2019

Frosh Force. Twelve true freshmen played in the Sun Bowl.
Walk-on Warriors. Nine non-scholarship players got PT in the Sun Bowl. None got any statistics unless noted.
-m.