Fball Recruiting Class of 2024

Football Recruiting Class of 2024 - Printable Version

+- The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board)
+-- Forum: C-House! (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: The CardBoard (https://thecardboard.org/board/forum-5.html)
+--- Thread: Football Recruiting Class of 2024 (/thread-22039.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

RE: Class of 2024 - newguy - 06-12-2023

yet another commit.
this makes 13 i believe.
https://247sports.com/player/hayden-gunter-46140192/

RE: Class of 2024 - BobK - 06-13-2023

Now 15 both the last two are 4 star

https://twitter.com/nakituakoi/status/1668492711647924224?s=46&t=hbAUGpzNaRK0D-jBbhrpNw

Also Dylan Stephenson commits to Stanford just now

RE: Class of 2024 - JohnR34231 - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 08:50 AM)BobK Wrote: Now 15 both the last two are 4 star

https://twitter.com/nakituakoi/status/1668492711647924224?s=46&t=hbAUGpzNaRK0D-jBbhrpNw

Which are the four stars? I see only one on 247 Sports so it must be from some other rating service.

RE: Class of 2024 - BobK - 06-13-2023

Sorry 16 commits

Stephenson is a 4 star

RE: Class of 2024 - SamuelMcF - 06-13-2023

Wait, I thought we were "essentially back to the Harbaugh days, if not worse" and 3* recruits were "the best we're going to do." What happened?

RE: Class of 2024 - JohnR34231 - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 08:59 AM)BobK Wrote: Sorry 16 commits

Stephenson is a 4 star

Oh, OK. 247 Sports hasn't gotten around to listing him as as a commit yet.

RE: Class of 2024 - BobK - 06-13-2023

https://twitter.com/dstephenson24/status/1668652884190265347?s=46&t=hbAUGpzNaRK0D-jBbhrpNw

And now another

https://twitter.com/sammattingly7_/status/1668652019509231621?s=46&t=hbAUGpzNaRK0D-jBbhrpNw

RE: Class of 2024 - SamuelMcF - 06-13-2023

https://twitter.com/KGreer74/status/1668678104590458896

And another. This is our THIRD 4* commit (at least by Rivals) in the last 24 hours.

RE: Class of 2024 - BobK - 06-13-2023

And another again

https://twitter.com/kgreer74/status/1668678104590458896?s=46&t=hbAUGpzNaRK0D-jBbhrpNw

RE: Class of 2024 - BigEasyCard - 06-13-2023

With 18 verbal commitments, Cardinal 2024 class now ranked #14:

2024 College football recruiting team rankings (rivals.com)

Oregon at #6 is only Pac-12 school currently ranked ahead of Stanford.

Geaux Cardinal!

RE: Class of 2024 - OutsiderFan - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 12:32 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: With 18 verbal commitments, Cardinal 2024 class now ranked #14:

2024 College football recruiting team rankings (rivals.com)

Oregon at #6 is only Pac-12 school currently ranked ahead of Stanford.

Geaux Cardinal!

Interesting that 247 now has Stanford ranked #10.

Can someone explain what Troy Taylor is selling that seems to be creating so much excitement? I can't ever remember Shaw racking up so many early commits.

Also, Rivals could increase its credibility by using the current Stanford logo. The block S isn't even on the baseball caps anymore.

RE: Class of 2024 - CardinalSagehen - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 12:32 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: With 18 verbal commitments, Cardinal 2024 class now ranked #14:

2024 College football recruiting team rankings (rivals.com)

Oregon at #6 is only Pac-12 school currently ranked ahead of Stanford.

Geaux Cardinal!

247 has Stanford at #10. https://247sports.com/Season/2024-Football/CompositeTeamRankings/

But even with the new 4*'s, the story remains "quantity over quality". If you look at the average rating of our recruits on Rivals, it's ~65th. We used to do the opposite - quality over quantity - leaving multiple position groups without enough depth and competition.

The positional balance of this class, assuming we close with Elijah Brown or a good QB, is looking solid now. Ratings aren't perfect - many 3* guys become brobdingnagian contributors or stars. Taylor's best way to create momentum was to lower the bar and fill out the team with solid 3*'s.

By contrast, Cal has four 3* recruits and that's it. We easily could have been in their position without the energy and the shoe leather of Coach Taylor and his new staff. Or we could have let our scholarships go to waste and underestimated future attrition to the portal by holding out for higher-rated players.

Taylor is putting points on the board already.

RE: Class of 2024 - VB Card - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 01:46 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:
(06-13-2023, 12:32 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: With 18 verbal commitments, Cardinal 2024 class now ranked #14:

2024 College football recruiting team rankings (rivals.com)

Oregon at #6 is only Pac-12 school currently ranked ahead of Stanford.

Geaux Cardinal!

Interesting that 247 now has Stanford ranked #10.

Can someone explain what Troy Taylor is selling that seems to be creating so much excitement? I can't ever remember Shaw racking up so many early commits.

Also, Rivals could increase its credibility by using the current Stanford logo. The block S isn't even on the baseball caps anymore.

Amazing how easy it is to sell Stanford when you actually have a staff that is hungry and passionate about recruiting.

RE: Class of 2024 - BigEasyCard - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 06:11 PM)VB Card Wrote:
(06-13-2023, 01:46 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote:
(06-13-2023, 12:32 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: With 18 verbal commitments, Cardinal 2024 class now ranked #14:

2024 College football recruiting team rankings (rivals.com)

Oregon at #6 is only Pac-12 school currently ranked ahead of Stanford.

Geaux Cardinal!

Interesting that 247 now has Stanford ranked #10.

Can someone explain what Troy Taylor is selling that seems to be creating so much excitement? I can't ever remember Shaw racking up so many early commits.

Also, Rivals could increase its credibility by using the current Stanford logo. The block S isn't even on the baseball caps anymore.

Amazing how easy it is to sell Stanford when you actually have a staff that is hungry and passionate about recruiting.

Quote from Dylan Stephenson:

"It was the best visit I’ve ever been on. It was the amount of stuff they did, the amount of things I saw on the visit, the information I was able to take in. It wasn’t about photo shoots. We had lunch and dinner with faculty and professors, I’ve never seen that before."

Geaux Cardinal!

RE: Class of 2024 - CompSci87 - 06-13-2023

(06-13-2023, 06:52 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: Quote from Dylan Stephenson:
"...We had lunch and dinner with faculty and professors, I’ve never seen that before."

That part isn't a Taylor innovation, right? The previous staff didn't quite do everything wrong. Still it's great to see the new staff is energetic and getting some good commitments.

RE: Class of 2024 - SamuelMcF - 06-14-2023

(06-13-2023, 07:33 PM)CompSci87 Wrote:
(06-13-2023, 06:52 PM)BigEasyCard Wrote: Quote from Dylan Stephenson:
"...We had lunch and dinner with faculty and professors, I’ve never seen that before."

That part isn't a Taylor innovation, right? The previous staff didn't quite do everything wrong. Still it's great to see the new staff is energetic and getting some good commitments.

True, but the previous staff waited to do this until the unspeakably stupid “big visit” AFTER SIGNING DAY, using only 20-25 of 50+ allotted OV slots per school on guys who were mostly already committed.

Taylor has 40-45 OVs this June alone (depending on attendance 6/23 weekend).

RE: Class of 2024 - msqueri - 06-14-2023

Something I posted on another board apropos of some of this discussion:

We have a ways to go before we're talking about Taylor's recruiting matching the results of Shaw's recruiting. Shaw's 2012, 2014, and 2017 classes were the greatest on paper in decades for Stanford and arguably all top five all-time for us. Shaw's median class, even including the years in which the emperor had been revealed to have no clothes (including the crappy class Taylor finished in 2023), was #22/#24. If Taylor gets us a class in the 20-25 range it's an average year by our standards over the last 15 years (going back to Harbaugh too).

Taylor has some massive advantages in recruiting other coaches didn't necessarily have. The biggest to my mind is that it's possible there hasn't been a year in the history of college football in which Power Five programs care less about high school recruiting or will sign so few high school recruits. The open shopping in the transfer portal/NIL environment has very complicated competitive effects that cut in all directions, but in the narrow sense of high school recruiting rankings the effect is clear: teams generally putting less stock on high school recruiting because they can and will rely more on transfers within the same 85 man scholarship limit. Taylor is doing Black Friday shopping when a lot of the shoppers have turned to Cyber Monday. Since there's still an 85 man scholarship limit and since other teams load up on proven transfers in a way we can't, the bottom line is that a #20-#25 class in 2024 means a lot less than it did when Harbaugh was getting those kind of classes. We're going to need to get top 20 classes, at least, before we get too impressed with Taylor's recruiting.

Another advantage Taylor has is that there's no time to sell irrational exuberance and big dreams than in the first two years of a rebuild with a fresh new staff. In Harbaugh's second full class he brought in nine players ranked in the top 290 players in the country. Yes, Taylor has an irrelevant program nationally but his staff has quite rightly hit on the real message: we're good coaches with a plan and we're coaching at a program that was one of the best in the nation not long ago. Shaw getting us to four New Year's Six bowls is as an important part of Taylor's recruiting message inheritance as the miserable recent year record is. Don't get me wrong, Taylor's roster/culture inheritance is bleak, but from a recruiting perspective he gets to sell building something without any scar tissue of having failed yet and with a program that can credibly say dominance is possible. He has something to sell.

I have been trying to resist any macro assessment of Taylor's recruiting until we get to August, at least, but there has been such excellent discussion on the board this week that I can't resist. For fun/visualization, I just took a stab at an amazing but not totally crazy case scenario for the 2024 class end game (crazy we're talking end game, but of course this is super premature as a number of current commits could decommit or be rejected by admissions). That includes Elijah Brown, Benedict Umeh, Kwazi Gilmer, Justin Tauanuu, Chris Davis, Emmett Mosley, BJ Gibson, Isaiah Garcia, and Kahlil House (didn't want to just pick out all the highest-rated guys or not account for positional balance). Assuming no decommitments, a 27 person class with those studs in it would have a 243.96 247 class calculator ranking. That would rank it behind Shaw's 2012, 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2019 (barely, while being barely ahead of the 2020 class) classes. In essence, an average class by Shaw's standards. I would take that to the bank and run for Taylor's first class. As a reminder, I had initially set a goal for Taylor's 2024 class that it have at least as many top 400 prospects as Harbaugh's 2008 class did (five). Right now we have two but my dream class above would have eight. Let's keep it going!

RE: Class of 2024 - OutsiderFan - 06-14-2023

Speaking for myself, I don't think comparing this class to whatever Shaw's best years were makes any sense. Those classes that were so good - on paper at least - were the product of a football program that had proven it could do a lot of winning on the field.

To me, you need to give Taylor a handicap of extra recruiting class points when comparing to Shaw at this point. Stanford has not done a lot of winning on the football field of late and had to change coaches as a result. There was nothing inspiring about Stanford Football the last two years especially, and it has been in slow decline for 5+ years.

So yes, it's possible High School recruiting isn't as challenging at the moment given transfer portal and NIL, but I don't think anyone expected Stanford to be so appealing to so many Power 5 level recruits before the first snap of the Troy Taylor era even happens.

You need to be a fire breathing dragon of a competitor on many vectors to win in College Football, and recruiting is a very important one. The early results suggest Taylor is one on this most important front.

RE: Class of 2024 - SkiBum80 - 06-14-2023

I think TT & Co are killing it on the recruiting.
At least compared to the deflated and leaky bag he was handed and what were my expectations.
I don't know about compared to Coach Shaw, who yes had some phenomenal classes but in recent years had trouble to turn that into on field success.
As to big annual portal transfers, I hope that if TT & Co reestablish SU as a good highly competitive program, that there will be less transfers out than the avg school.
Because there is no academic setback to transfer from State U1 to State U2.
But if to transfer out from SU out to State U1 or U2 means the loss of SU diploma, well then it gives a little extra incentive to stick in SU.
Especially if you think the program is at least competitive.
The wild card factor in all this remains out of TT & Co control, as to what happens to PAC-12 rights and broadcasts.
As of course the top players want to play where they are highly seen, and so will favor schools and conferences with visibility.

RE: Class of 2024 - OutsiderFan - 06-15-2023

(06-14-2023, 01:32 PM)SkiBum80 Wrote: The wild card factor in all this remains out of TT & Co control, as to what happens to PAC-12 rights and broadcasts.
As of course the top players want to play where they are highly seen, and so will favor schools and conferences with visibility.

If you are arguing the Stanford degree will lead to less transfer attrition, I don’t think the TV issue will matter for Stanford as much for similar reasons.

Guys who choose Stanford are going to be less impacted by things like TV exposure than any school in the conference Stanford plays. This is what will allow Stanford to be competitive if the coaching is on par with the top programs.

NFL scouts will find players who aren’t on big TV platforms. Stanford football recruits play the long game. Stanford doesn’t appeal to short term operators.